Modified leaky competing accumulator model of decision making with multiple alternatives: the Lie-algebraic approach

被引:0
|
作者
Chi-Fai Lo
Ho-Yan Ip
机构
[1] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Institute of Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this communication, based upon the stochastic Gompertz law of population growth, we have reformulated the Leaky Competing Accumulator (LCA) model with multiple alternatives such that the positive-definiteness of evidence accumulation is automatically satisfied. By exploiting the Lie symmetry of the backward Kolmogorov equation (or Fokker–Planck equation) assoicated with the modified model and applying the Wei–Norman theorem, we have succeeded in deriving the N-dimensional joint probability density function (p.d.f.) and marginal p.d.f. for each alternative in closed form. With this joint p.d.f., a likelihood function can be constructed and thus model-fitting procedures become feasible. We have also demonstrated that the calibration of model parameters based upon the Monte Carlo simulated time series is indeed both efficient and accurate. Moreover, it should be noted that the proposed Lie-algebraic approach can also be applied to tackle the modified LCA model with time-varying parameters.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Modified leaky competing accumulator model of decision making with multiple alternatives: the Lie-algebraic approach
    Lo, Chi-Fai
    Ip, Ho-Yan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] How to Say "No" to a Nonword: A Leaky Competing Accumulator Model of Lexical Decision
    Dufau, Stephane
    Grainger, Jonathan
    Ziegler, Johannes C.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (04) : 1117 - 1128
  • [3] An Integration Approach to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Preference Information on Alternatives
    Zhang, Quan
    Feng, Wen-Jia
    Shao, Dan
    2008 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 3977 - 3981
  • [4] Ranking the Alternatives With a Modified TOPSIS Method in Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems
    Abootalebi, S.
    Hadi-Vencheh, A.
    Jamshidi, A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (05) : 1800 - 1805
  • [5] Using time-varying evidence to test models of decision dynamics: bounded diffusion vs. the leaky competing accumulator model
    Tsetsos, Konstantinos
    Gao, Juan
    McClelland, James L.
    Usher, Marius
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [6] An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives
    Fan, ZP
    Ma, J
    Zhang, Q
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 131 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [7] A multiple criteria decision making model for comparative analysis of remedial action alternatives
    Hope, BK
    MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING FOR LAND, WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, : 143 - 152
  • [8] A consistency-based approach to multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives
    Liang, Haiming
    Gong, Qiang
    Dong, Yucheng
    Ding, Zhaogang
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 119 : 360 - 369
  • [9] Ranking of Alternatives in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Fuzzy Preference Relation Based Approach
    Das, Sujit
    Ghosh, Pijush Kanti
    Kar, Samarjit
    2013 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (ISCBI), 2013, : 127 - 130
  • [10] Multiple criteria based decision making using modified VIKOR - fuzzy integration approach
    Li, Ning
    Feng, Junwen
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 40 (04) : 8417 - 8425