Subsurface CO2 Dynamics in Temperate Beech and Spruce Forest Stands

被引:0
|
作者
Bo Elberling
Pernille Ladegaard-Pedersen
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Institute of Geography
来源
Biogeochemistry | 2005年 / 75卷
关键词
CO; efflux; Soil carbon turnover; Soil respiration; Temperate forest; Temperature;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rates of soil respiration (CO2 effluxes), subsurface pore gas CO2/O2 concentrations, soil temperature and soil water content were measured for 15 months in two temperate and contrasting Danish forest ecosystems: beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Soil CO2 effluxes showed a distinct seasonal trend in the range of 0.48–3.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 for beech and 0.50–2.92 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 for spruce and were well-correlated with near-surface soil temperatures. The soil organic C-stock (upper 1 m including the O-horizon) was higher in the spruce stand (184±23 Mg C ha−1) compared to the beech stand (93±19 Mg C ha−1) and resulted in a faster turnover time as calculated by mass/flux in soil beneath the beech stand (28 years) compared to spruce stand (60 years). Observed soil CO2 concentrations and effluxes were simulated using a Fickian diffusion-reaction model based on vertical CO2 production rates and soil diffusivity. Temporal trends were simulated on the basis of observed trends in the distribution of soil water, temperature, and live roots as well as temperature and water content sensitivity functions. These functions were established based on controlled laboratory incubation experiments. The model was successfully validated against observed soil CO2 effluxes and concentrations and revealed that temporal trends generally could be linked to variations in subsurface CO2 production rates and diffusion over time and with depths. However, periods with exceptionally high CO2 effluxes (> 20 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) were noted in March 2000 in relation to drying after heavy rain and after the removal of snow from collars. Both cases were considered non-steady state and could not be simulated.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 506
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subsurface CO2 dynamics in temperate beech and spruce forest stands
    Elberling, B
    Ladegaard-Pedersen, P
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 75 (03) : 479 - 506
  • [2] Spruce and beech forest stands water balance
    Tuzinsky, L
    EKOLOGIA-BRATISLAVA, 2000, 19 (02): : 198 - 210
  • [3] Dark CO2 fixation in temperate beech and pine forest soils
    Akinyede, Rachael
    Taubert, Martin
    Schrumpf, Marion
    Trumbore, Susan
    Kuesel, Kirsten
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 165
  • [4] Multiple quality tests for analysing CO2 fluxes in a beech temperate forest
    Longdoz, B.
    Gross, P.
    Granier, A.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2008, 5 (03) : 719 - 729
  • [5] Discovering the importance of lateral CO2 transport from a temperate spruce forest
    Fiedler, Sabine
    Hoell, Bettina S.
    Jungkunst, Hennann F.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 368 (2-3) : 909 - 915
  • [6] Soil CO2 dynamics, acidification, and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO2 enrichment
    Andrews, JA
    Schlesinger, WH
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2001, 15 (01) : 149 - 162
  • [7] Dynamics of Soil CO2 Efflux and Vertical CO2 Production in a European Beech and a Scots Pine Forest
    Jochheim, Hubert
    Wirth, Stephan
    Gartiser, Valentin
    Paulus, Sinikka
    Haas, Christoph
    Gerke, Horst H.
    Maier, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [8] EVAPOTRANSPIRATION OF BEECH STANDS AND TRANSPIRATION OF BEECH LEAVES SUBJECT TO ATMOSPHERIC CO2 ENRICHMENT
    OVERDIECK, D
    FORSTREUTER, M
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 14 (7-9) : 997 - 1003
  • [9] DYNAMICS OF THE PHYTOCENOSES DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBMOUNTAIN BEECH FOREST STANDS .2. POPULATIONS
    KONTRISOVA, O
    KONTRIS, J
    GREGOR, J
    EKOLOGIA-BRATISLAVA, 1993, 12 (04): : 429 - 439
  • [10] GROWTH AND PROSPERITY OF BEECH AND SYCAMORE MAPLE PLANTINGS IN YOUNG NORWAY SPRUCE AND BLUE SPRUCE FOREST STANDS
    Spulak, Ondrej
    Soucek, Jiri
    Bartos, Jan
    REPORTS OF FORESTRY RESEARCH-ZPRAVY LESNICKEHO VYZKUMU, 2010, 55 (03): : 171 - 179