Self-controlled responses to COVID-19: Self-control and uncertainty predict responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
|
作者
Jordan E. Rodriguez
Hayden L. Holmes
Jessica L. Alquist
Liad Uziel
Alec J. Stinnett
机构
[1] Texas Tech University,
[2] Bar-Ilan University,undefined
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Self-control; COVID-19; Health behaviors; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two online studies (Total N = 331) tested the hypothesis that individual differences in self-control and responses to uncertainty would predict adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2020a) guidelines, reported stockpiling, and intentions to engage in hedonic behavior in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Trait self-control (b = 0.27, p = .015), desire for self-control (Study 1: b = 0.28, p = .001; Study 2: b = 0.27, p = .005), and cognitive uncertainty (b = 0.73, p < .001) predicted more CDC adherence. State self-control (Study 1: b = −0.15, p = .012; Study 2: b = −0.26, p < .001) predicted less stockpiling, whereas emotional uncertainty (b = 0.56, p < .001) and cognitive uncertainty (b = 0.61, p < .001) predicted more stockpiling. State self-control (b = −0.18, p = .003) predicted less hedonic behavior, whereas desire for self-control (b = 0.42, p < .001) and emotional uncertainty (b = 0.26, p = .018) predicted more hedonic behavior. Study 2 (pre-registered) also found that emotional uncertainty predicted more stockpiling and hedonic behavior for participants low in state self-control (stockpiling: b = −0.31, p < .001; hedonic behavior: b = 0.28, p = .025), but not for participants high in state self-control (stockpiling: b = 0.03, p = .795; hedonic behavior: b = −0.24, p = .066). These findings provide evidence that some forms of self-control and uncertainty influenced compliance with behavioral recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:7321 / 7335
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-controlled responses to COVID-19: Self-control and uncertainty predict responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Rodriguez, Jordan E.
    Holmes, Hayden L.
    Alquist, Jessica L.
    Uziel, Liad
    Stinnett, Alec J.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (09) : 7321 - 7335
  • [2] The self-controlled case series method and covid-19
    Farrington, Paddy
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 377
  • [3] Self-organization's responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in China
    Zhao, Ting
    Xu, Jialiang
    Tian, Yuan
    Zhang, Qiwei
    Yuan, Junao
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 42 (02) : 154 - 158
  • [4] Governments' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Edwards, Frances
    Ott, J. Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 44 (11-12) : 879 - 884
  • [5] Firms' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Klockner, Maximilian
    Schmidt, Christoph G.
    Wagner, Stephan M.
    Swink, Morgan
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 158
  • [6] Religious responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Hammer, Olav
    Swartz, Karen
    APPROACHING RELIGION, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 4
  • [7] Governmental responses to COVID-19 Pandemic
    Peci, Alketa
    Avellaneda, Claudia Nancy
    Suzuki, Kohei
    REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2021, 55 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [8] Global Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Cassell, Cynthia H.
    Raghunathan, Pratima L.
    Henao, Olga
    Pappas-DeLuca, Katina A.
    Remy, Whitney L.
    Dokubo, Emily Kainne
    Merrill, Rebecca D.
    Marston, Barbara J.
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 28 : S4 - S7
  • [9] Global Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    John Steven Ott
    Frances L. Edwards
    Pitima Boonyarak
    Public Organization Review, 2021, 21 : 619 - 627
  • [10] Social responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
    He, Wu
    Xu, Guandong
    Razzak, Imran
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 42 (02) : 171 - 173