A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial comparing two loading doses of aminophylline

被引:8
|
作者
Hochwald C. [1 ]
Kennedy K. [2 ]
Chang J. [1 ]
Moya F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Memorial Hermann Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
[2] Department of Pediatrics, UT Houston School of Medicine, Houston, TX
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7210737
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare 8 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg loading doses of aminophylline. Study design: Sixty-one preterm infants weighing <1500 g were enrolled once a decision to administer intravenous aminophylline was made. A standard maintenance dose was used. Serum levels of theophylline were drawn 8 hours after the loading dose and before the fifth maintenance dose. Results: After the initial loading dose, the 8 mg/kg group achieved recommended serum theophylline levels (7-12 μg/ml) more frequently than the 6 mg/kg groups (39% vs 3%, p=0.002). Subsequent levels were similar between the groups. There were no increases in side effects with the higher loading dose. Conclusion: If a clinical decision to start intravenous aminophylline therapy in preterm infants has been made, the use of an 8 mg/kg loading dose appears to be a better and safe way to quickly achieve serum theophylline levels within the recommended range.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 278
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER PERIOPERATIVE LOADING DOSES OF METHADONE OR MORPHINE
    CHUI, PT
    GIN, T
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1992, 20 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [2] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    ENGLISH, PMB
    TITCHEN, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1992, 42 (354): : 37 - 38
  • [3] A randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing two regimens of vitamin D supplementation in preterm neonates
    M Tergestina
    G Rebekah
    V Job
    A Simon
    N Thomas
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2016, 36 : 763 - 767
  • [4] A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial Comparing Two Screening Devices for Radiation Contamination
    Salen, Philip
    Porter, Mathew
    Watts, David
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    Lynch, Alan
    Michaelis, Christopher
    Melanson, Scott
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (09) : 1020 - 1023
  • [5] A randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing two regimens of vitamin D supplementation in preterm neonates
    Tergestina, M.
    Rebekah, G.
    Job, V.
    Simon, A.
    Thomas, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (09) : 763 - 767
  • [6] The effect of aminophylline on renal colic: A randomized double blind controlled trial
    Djaladat, Hooman
    Tajik, Parvin
    Fard, Salman Abbasi
    Alehashemi, Sara
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 100 (11) : 1081 - 1084
  • [7] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of two different doses of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to office hysteroscopy
    El-Khayat, Waleed
    Dwidar, Login
    Elsawah, Heba
    Idris, Omima
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [8] DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF AMINOPHYLLINE IN STATUS ASTHMATICUS
    PIERSON, W
    BIERMAN, CW
    STAMM, SJ
    VANARSDE.PP
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1971, 48 (04) : 642 - &
  • [9] A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING PINACIDIL TO HYDRALAZINE IN ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    BYYNY, RL
    NIES, AS
    LOVERDE, ME
    MITCHELL, WD
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 42 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [10] Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effects of ibuprofen with placebo on cerebral hemodynamics
    Naulaers, G
    Delanghe, G
    Allegaert, K
    Casaer, P
    Devlieger, H
    Van Overmeire, B
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (04) : 338A - 338A