机构:Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM),Department of Technology and Sustainable Development (TSD), Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
J S Clancy
机构:
[1] Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM),Department of Technology and Sustainable Development (TSD), Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
Biofuels are back in vogue. They are an attractive substitute for petroleum fuels, representing a relatively low cost alternative. In response to the 1970s oil crises a small number of countries began biofuel programmes, Brazil having the most extensive and well known programme resulting in ethanol being produced commercially as a fuel. Since the turn of the millennium, a number of forces have combined together to promote biofuel production once more: fuel security, high oil prices; environmental concerns linked to the enhancement of the greenhouse effect; rural development and poverty reduction. This paper reviews the evidence as to whether or not biofuels are pro-poor by assessing the impacts on land use (including food security), the local environment, jobs and gender equality. The paper concludes that biofuels are a technical system and it is the institutional structure rather than the technology which determines whether or not biofuels are pro-poor.
机构:
Department of Economics, University of Göttingen, DIAL Paris and DIW Berlin, 37073 Göttingen
Department of Economics, University of Göttingen, 37073 GöttingenDepartment of Economics, University of Göttingen, DIAL Paris and DIW Berlin, 37073 Göttingen