Are biofuels pro-poor? Assessing the evidence

被引:0
|
作者
J S Clancy
机构
[1] Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM),Department of Technology and Sustainable Development (TSD), Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM)
[2] The University of Twente,undefined
关键词
biofuels; rural poverty;
D O I
10.1080/09578810802245618
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biofuels are back in vogue. They are an attractive substitute for petroleum fuels, representing a relatively low cost alternative. In response to the 1970s oil crises a small number of countries began biofuel programmes, Brazil having the most extensive and well known programme resulting in ethanol being produced commercially as a fuel. Since the turn of the millennium, a number of forces have combined together to promote biofuel production once more: fuel security, high oil prices; environmental concerns linked to the enhancement of the greenhouse effect; rural development and poverty reduction. This paper reviews the evidence as to whether or not biofuels are pro-poor by assessing the impacts on land use (including food security), the local environment, jobs and gender equality. The paper concludes that biofuels are a technical system and it is the institutional structure rather than the technology which determines whether or not biofuels are pro-poor.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 431
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条