Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
Marit Solbjør
Martin Inge Standal
Egil Andreas Fors
Roger Hagen
Gunnhild Bagøien
Roar Johnsen
Karen Walseth Hara
Heidi Fossen
Ida Løchting
Hedda Eik
Margreth Grotle
Lene Aasdahl
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science
[2] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences
[3] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
[4] University of Oslo,Department of Psychology
[5] Research Institute,Division of Psychiatry, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olavs Hospital
[6] Trondheim University Hospital,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders
[7] The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag,Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy
[8] St. Olavs Hospital,Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI) Clinic for Surgery and Neurology
[9] Trondheim University Hospital,undefined
[10] Oslo Metropolitan University,undefined
[11] Oslo University Hospital,undefined
[12] Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre,undefined
来源
关键词
Motivational interviewing; Return to work; Sick leave; RE-AIM; Process evaluation; Mixed-methods; Social insurance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing motivational interviewing (MI) as a return to work (RTW) intervention in a Norwegian social insurance setting. Methods A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving MI sessions delivered by social insurance caseworkers. The study was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using focus groups with the caseworkers. MI fidelity was evaluated through audio-recordings of MI sessions and questionnaires to sick-listed participants. Results Lack of co-worker and managerial support, time and place for practicing to further develop MI skills, and a high workload made the MI intervention challenging for the caseworkers. The MI method was experienced as useful, but difficult to master. MI fidelity results showed technical global scores over the threshold for “beginning proficiency” whereas the relational global score was under the threshold. The sick-listed workers reported being satisfied with the MI sessions. Conclusions Despite caseworker motivation for learning and using MI in early follow-up sessions, MI was hard to master and use in practice. Several barriers and facilitators were identified; these should be addressed before implementing MI in a social insurance setting.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 795
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
    Foldal, Vegard Stolsmo
    Solbjor, Marit
    Standal, Martin Inge
    Fors, Egil Andreas
    Hagen, Roger
    Bagoien, Gunnhild
    Johnsen, Roar
    Hara, Karen Walseth
    Fossen, Heidi
    Lochting, Ida
    Eik, Hedda
    Grotle, Margreth
    Aasdahl, Lene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 31 (04) : 785 - 795
  • [2] Process Evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention in a Social Security Setting: A Qualitative Study among Work-Disabled Patients
    Rymenans, I.
    Vanovenberghe, C.
    Du Bois, M.
    van den Broeck, A.
    Lauwerier, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 34 (01) : 141 - 156
  • [3] Process Evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention in a Social Security Setting: A Qualitative Study among Work-Disabled Patients
    I. Rymenans
    C. Vanovenberghe
    M. Du Bois
    A. Van den Broeck
    E. Lauwerier
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2024, 34 : 141 - 156
  • [4] Barriers to implementing motivational interviewing in addiction treatment: A nominal group technique process evaluation
    Hatch, Melissa R.
    Carandang, Kristine
    Moullin, Joanna C.
    Ehrhart, Mark G.
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 2
  • [5] Motivational interviewing to support medication adherence in older patients: Barriers and facilitators for implementing in hospital setting according to healthcare professionals
    Temedda, Mohamed Nour
    Haesebaert, Julie
    Viprey, Marie
    Schott, Anne Marie
    Dima, Alexandra L.
    Schneider, Marie Paule
    Novais, Teddy
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 124
  • [6] Overcoming Barriers and Recognizing Facilitators of Implementing Urban Jail Community Reentry Programming: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
    Jaegers, Lisa
    Hayes, Christine
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2018, 72 (04):
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to implementing a motivational interviewing-based intervention: a multi-site study of organizations caring for youth living with HIV
    Nagy, Samantha M.
    Butame, Seyram A.
    Todd, Lisa
    Sheffler, Julia L.
    Budhwani, Henna
    Fernandez, Maria, I
    MacDonell, Karen
    Naar, Sylvie
    [J]. AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2022, 34 (04): : 486 - 491
  • [8] Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to School Social Work Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Teasley, Martell
    Canifield, James P.
    Archuleta, Adrian J.
    Crutchfield, Jandel
    Chavis, Annie McCullough
    [J]. CHILDREN & SCHOOLS, 2012, 34 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [9] Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Attachment-based Family Therapy into a Child Welfare Setting: A Qualitative Process Evaluation
    Santens, Tara
    Hannes, Karin
    Levy, Suzanne
    Diamond, Guy
    Bosmans, Guy
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (04) : 1483 - 1497
  • [10] The barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia education and training in health and social care services: a mixed-methods study
    Surr, Claire A.
    Parveen, Sahdia
    Smith, Sarah J.
    Drury, Michelle
    Sass, Cara
    Burden, Sarah
    Oyebode, Jan
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)