The Rankings Game: Managing Business School Reputation

被引:0
|
作者
Corley K. [1 ]
Gioia D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pennsylvania State University,
关键词
advertising; brand; communications; corporate branding; e-communication; identity; image; intangibles; philanthropy; positioning; reputation; stakeholder;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540123
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The environment of business education now resembles aspects of the competitive environment facing for-profit industries. A major contributor to the character of this environment in the USA are the published rankings of business school programs, which have risen in prominence over the last decade. We conducted interviews with top management team members from the top 50 business schools in the USA to assess the effects of business school rankings on the conduct of business education. These informants characterized the rankings process predominantly as a game where the players face a field that is not always level and where the rules are not only ill-specified but also subtly changing. Our examination of how business schools play ‘the rankings game’ revealed a structuration-like pattern whereby projected images by business schools and subsequent responses to those images both enabled and constrained further action by the schools as well as the magazines responsible for the rankings. This pattern has implications not only for gaining insights into the management of reputation in academia, but also for conceptualizing relationships among image and substance in a world increasingly dominated by media. © 2000, Palgrave Macmillan.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 333
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reputation Beyond the Rankings: A Conceptual Framework for Business School Research
    Vidaver-Cohen D.
    Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, 10 (4) : 278 - 304
  • [2] How good are business school rankings?
    Dichev, ID
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1999, 72 (02): : 201 - 213
  • [3] Business school rankings and business school deans: A study of nonprofit governance
    Fee, CE
    Hadlock, CJ
    Pierce, JR
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 34 (01) : 143 - 166
  • [4] Business school rankings: content and context
    Peters, Kai
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 26 (01) : 49 - +
  • [5] Avoiding the Iron Cage of Business School Rankings
    Josep M. Lozano
    Ivan Bofarull
    Sandra Waddock
    Queralt Prat-i-Pubill
    Higher Education Policy, 2020, 33 : 135 - 157
  • [6] International business research: Trends and school rankings
    Chan, Kam C.
    Fung, Hung-Gay
    Leung, Wai K.
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 15 (04) : 317 - 338
  • [7] Avoiding the Iron Cage of Business School Rankings
    Lozano, Josep M.
    Bofarull, Ivan
    Waddock, Sandra
    Prat-i-Pubill, Queralt
    HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2020, 33 (01) : 135 - 157
  • [8] Strategic disclosure: The case of business school rankings
    Luca, Michael
    Smith, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 112 : 17 - 25
  • [9] An Experimental Study of the Reputation Mechanism in a Business Game
    Greco, Marco
    Branca, Antonio Maurizio
    Morena, Gianfranco
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 2011, 42 (01) : 27 - 42
  • [10] Business school rankings: the love-hate relationship
    Bradshaw, Della
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 26 (01) : 54 - +