False belief reasoning in the brain: An ERP study

被引:0
|
作者
YiWen Wang
Yan Liu
YanXia Gao
Jing Chen
Wenxin Zhang
ChongDe Lin
机构
[1] Southeast University,Research Center of Learning Science
[2] Shandong Normal University,School of Psychology
[3] Beijing Normal University,The State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
关键词
theory-of-mind; false belief; event-related potentials; late negative component (LNC); inhibition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding others mind and interpersonal interaction are the cognitive basis of successful social interactions. People’s mental states and behaviors rely on their holding beliefs for self and others. To investigate the neural substrates of false belief reasoning, the 32 channels event-related potentials (ERP) of 14 normal adults were measured while they understood false-belief and true belief used deceptive appearance task. After onset of the false-belief or true-belief questions, N100, P200 and late negative component (LNC) were elicited at centro-frontal sites. Compared with true belief, false belief reasoning elicited significant declined LNC in the time window from 400 to 800 ms. The source analysis of difference wave (False minus True) showed a dipole located in the middle cingulated cortex. These findings show that false belief reasoning probably included inhibitive process.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] False belief reasoning in the brain: An ERP study
    WANG YiWen1
    2 School of Psychology
    3 The State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
    [J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2008, (01) : 72 - 79
  • [2] False belief reasoning in the brain: An ERP study
    Wang YiWen
    Liu Yan
    Gao YanXia
    Chen Jing
    Zhang Wenxin
    Lin ChongDe
    [J]. SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES C-LIFE SCIENCES, 2008, 51 (01): : 72 - 79
  • [3] Inhibiting one's own knowledge in false belief reasoning: An ERP study
    Zhang, Ting
    Sha, Wenju
    Zheng, Xueru
    Ouyang, Hanlu
    Li, Hong
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 467 (03) : 194 - 198
  • [4] SAME OR DIFFERENT? ERP CORRELATES OF PRETENSE AND FALSE BELIEF REASONING IN CHILDREN
    Kuehn-Popp, N.
    Sodian, B.
    Sommer, M.
    Doehnel, K.
    Meinhardt, J.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 248 : 488 - 498
  • [5] Belief and sign, true and false: the unique of false belief reasoning
    Zhang, Ting
    Zhang, Qin
    Li, Yiyuan
    Long, Changquan
    Li, Hong
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 231 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [6] Belief and sign, true and false: the unique of false belief reasoning
    Ting Zhang
    Qin Zhang
    Yiyuan Li
    Changquan Long
    Hong Li
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2013, 231 : 27 - 36
  • [7] The neurophysiology of theory of mind: An erp study of false belief understanding
    Liu, D
    Sabbagh, MA
    Gehring, IJ
    Wellman, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 130 - 131
  • [8] Why not LF for false belief reasoning?
    de Villiers, JG
    de Villiers, PA
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2002, 25 (06) : 682 - +
  • [9] Theory of mind in dysphoric and non--dysphoric adults: An ERP study of true-- and false--belief reasoning
    Mangardich, Haykaz
    Tollefson, Nicholas
    Harkness, Kate L.
    Sabbagh, Mark A.
    [J]. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01) : 73 - 85
  • [10] An fMRI study on the comparison of different types of false belief reasoning: False belief-based emotion and behavior attribution
    Doehnel, Katrin
    Schuwerk, Tobias
    Sodian, Beate
    Hajak, Goeran
    Rupprecht, Rainer
    Sommer, Monika
    [J]. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (06) : 730 - 742