Quantification of pulmonary regurgitation and prediction of pulmonary valve replacement by echocardiography in patients with congenital heart defects in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Claudia Dellas
Laura Kammerer
Verena Gravenhorst
Joachim Lotz
Thomas Paul
Michael Steinmetz
机构
[1] University Medical Center Goettingen,Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center
[2] University Medical Center Goettingen,Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heart Center
[3] German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK),undefined
[4] partner site Goettingen,undefined
关键词
Echocardiography; Pulmonary regurgitation; Congenital heart disease; Pulmonary valve replacement; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is common in patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) and contributes to morbidity and mortality in the long-term. We investigated in this retrospective analysis whether readily accessible echocardiographic parameters are useful for quantification of PR and for predicting pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in comparison to the gold-standard phase contrast (PC) flow measurements from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Continuous wave (CW) Doppler and colour flow images in echocardiograms from 53 patients with CHD were analysed. Slope and jet-to-RVOT ratio correlated significantly with CMR-assessed regurgitation fraction (RF), whereas pressure half time (PHT) showed an inverse correlation. Patients with mild PR in CMR had significantly higher PHT, lower slope and jet-to-RVOT ratio than patients with moderate or severe regurgitation. The AUC regarding PR severity was 0.778 for PHT (95% CI, 0.649–0.907; P = 0.007 for CMR-RF ≤ 35%), 0.744 for slope (95% CI, 0.603–0.885; P = 0.017 for CMR-RF > 35%) and 0.652 for jet-to-RVOT ratio (95% CI, 0.473–0.860; P = 0.168 for CMR-RF > 35%). The optimal cut-off values calculated from ROC analysis were 95 ms for PHT and 4.9 m/s2 for slope. In logistic regression analysis, slope emerged as the most valuable parameter for predicting the indication for PVR (OR 12.9, 95% CI, 1.8–90.9, P = 0.010). In conclusion, echocardiographic assessment of PR was feasible. Both parameters, PHT and in particular slope, were predictors for PVR. Thus, echocardiography appears appropriate in the management of patients with PR.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 613
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of pulmonary regurgitation and prediction of pulmonary valve replacement by echocardiography in patients with congenital heart defects in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Dellas, Claudia
    Kammerer, Laura
    Gravenhorst, Verena
    Lotz, Joachim
    Paul, Thomas
    Steinmetz, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 34 (04): : 607 - 613
  • [2] Multimodality Imaging of the Neglected Valve: Role of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography in Pulmonary Stenosis and Regurgitation
    Costantini, Pietro
    Perone, Francesco
    Siani, Agnese
    Groenhoff, Leon
    Muscogiuri, Giuseppe
    Sironi, Sandro
    Marra, Paolo
    Carriero, Serena
    Pavon, Anna Giulia
    Guglielmo, Marco
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2022, 8 (10)
  • [3] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Sirin, Selma
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Neudorf, Ulrich
    Jensen, Christoph J.
    Mikat, Christian
    Schlosser, Thomas
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [4] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Selma Sirin
    Kai Nassenstein
    Ulrich Neudorf
    Christoph J. Jensen
    Christian Mikat
    Thomas Schlosser
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2014, 35 : 771 - 777
  • [5] Prospective Comparison of Valve Regurgitation Quantitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Cawley, Peter J.
    Hamilton-Craig, Christian
    Owens, David S.
    Krieger, Eric V.
    Strugnell, Wendy E.
    Mitsumori, Lee
    D'Jang, Caryn L.
    Schwaegler, Rebecca G.
    Nguyen, Khanh Q.
    Bianca Nguyen
    Maki, Jeffrey H.
    Otto, Catherine M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [6] 1060 Evaluation of aortic valve regurgitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with echocardiography
    Nisha Surenderanath
    Faris Al-Mousily
    Douglas Theriaque
    Jonathan Shuster
    Carolyn Spencer
    Margaret M Samyn
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] A new simple method to quantify pulmonary regurgitation by Echocardiography: comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Festa, P. G.
    Ait-Ali, L.
    Kristo, I.
    Deana, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 795 - 796
  • [8] Evaluation of pulmonary regurgitation using echocardiography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging flow assessment
    Gomes, L.
    Jones, B.
    Cahoon, G.
    Ditchfield, M.
    Penny, D.
    Cheung, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 929 - 929
  • [9] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISONS OF CHAMBER AND VALVE QUANTIFICATION BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN AORTIC AND MITRAL REGURGITATION PATIENTS
    Wang, Tom Kai Ming
    Popovic, Zoran
    Rodriguez, L. Leonardo
    Bolen, Michael
    Moennich, Laurie Ann
    Rutkowski, Katy
    Griffin, Brian P.
    Grimm, Richard A.
    Flamm, Scott D.
    Kwon, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 1337 - 1337
  • [10] Quantification of Valve Regurgitation in the Pediatric Population Using 3-Dimensional Echocardiography: Feasibility and Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kuebler, Joseph D.
    Shea, Melinda H.
    Lu, Minmin
    Sleeper, Lynn A.
    Harrild, David M.
    Prakash, Ashwin
    Marx, Gerald R.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144