Screen bowl centrifuge: a high-efficiency particle size separator

被引:0
|
作者
M. K. Mohanty
B. Zhang
N. Khanna
A. Palit
B. Dube
机构
[1] Southern Illinois University at Carbondale,Department of Mining and Mineral Resources Engineering
来源
关键词
Coal; Size classification; Parametric study; Screen bowl centrifuge;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the years, screen bowl centrifuges have been widely used for dew atering fine coal in coal preparation plants in the United States and elsewhere. Its popularity is attributed to its relatively low cost, its high capacity of providing low moisture content product and its relative ease of operation and maintenance. It is generally recognized in the engineering and scientific communities that screen bowl centrifuges provide some degree of particle size separation while dew atering fine coal in a common application. However, the extent of differential partitioning of coarse and fine particles achievable by a screen bowl centrifuge has not been systematically studied in the past. The present investigation was aimed at conducting a parametric study using a statistically designed experimental program to better understand and optimize the size classification performance of a screen bowl centrifuge. A continuously operating screen bowl centrifuge having a bowl diameter of 0.5 m was used for this study at the Illinois Coal Development Park. Three key operating parameters, i.e., feed flow rate, feed solid content and pool depth, were varied to conduct a total of 17 experiments using a three-level factorial test matrix. Sonic of the best size separation performances achieved in this study may be described as having an imperfection value of 0.13 at an effective separation size (d50c) of 38 µm and an imperfection value of 0.27 at an effective separation size (d50c) of 2.8 µm. Due to an effective separation of ultrafine high ash materials, the ash content of the screen bowl feed was reduced from 22.3% to a minimum of 8.84% with a combustible recovery of 84.1% and an ash rejection of 71.6%. A higher combustible recovery of 92.1% was achieved at a product ash content of 12.5% with a d50c of 2.8 µm and imperfection of 0.27.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screen bowl centrifuge: a high-efficiency particle size separator
    Mohanty, M. K.
    Zhang, B.
    Khanna, N.
    Palit, A.
    Dube, B.
    MINERALS & METALLURGICAL PROCESSING, 2008, 25 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [2] Screen bowl centrifuge: A high-efficiency particle size separator
    Department of Mining and Mineral Resources Engineering, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, United States
    Miner Metall Process, 2008, 2 (61-67): : 61 - 67
  • [3] A high-efficiency superhydrophobic plasma separator
    Liu, Changchun
    Liao, Shih-Chuan
    Song, Jinzhao
    Mauk, Michael G.
    Li, Xuanwen
    Wu, Gaoxiang
    Ge, Dengteng
    Greenberg, Robert M.
    Yang, Shu
    Bau, Haim H.
    LAB ON A CHIP, 2016, 16 (03) : 553 - 560
  • [4] Influence of particle size on inertial particle separator efficiency
    Barone, Dominic
    Loth, Eric
    Snyder, Philip
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 318 : 177 - 185
  • [5] A NEW HIGH-EFFICIENCY LIQUID LIQUID SEPARATOR
    WOILLEZ, J
    SCHUMMER, P
    LECOFFRE, Y
    MULTI-PHASE FLOW: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 1989, : 117 - 131
  • [6] THE CYCLONE SCRUBBER - A HIGH-EFFICIENCY WET SEPARATOR
    KRAMES, J
    BUTTNER, H
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 17 (02) : 73 - 80
  • [7] New high-efficiency separator for Phoenix Cement
    不详
    ZKG INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 63 (09): : 20 - 23
  • [8] DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCREEN BOWL CENTRIFUGE FOR DEWATERING COAL FINES
    POLICOW, ND
    ORPHANOS, JS
    MINING ENGINEERING, 1983, 35 (04) : 333 - 336
  • [9] A High-Efficiency Separator Upgrade THREADING A SEPARATOR THROUGH THE EYE OF A NEEDLE
    Edwards, Andy
    Paone, Peter
    Siberski, S. Douglas
    IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2018, 24 (04) : 60 - 69
  • [10] Evaluation of Separation Efficiency in a Tubular Bowl Centrifuge
    Patan, Sumayabanu
    Velaga, Satish K.
    Sanapala, V. S.
    Ananthasivan, Krishnamurthy
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 45 (02) : 329 - 339