Interdependence of social-ecological-technological systems in Phoenix, Arizona: consequences of an extreme precipitation event

被引:4
|
作者
Helmrich A. [1 ]
Kuhn A. [2 ]
Roque A. [3 ]
Santibanez A. [4 ]
Kim Y. [5 ]
Grimm N.B. [2 ]
Chester M. [4 ]
机构
[1] College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
[2] School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
[3] Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
[4] School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
[5] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Critical infrastructure; Flooding; Infrastructure systems; Interconnected; Resilience; SETS;
D O I
10.1186/s43065-023-00085-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complex adaptive systems – such as critical infrastructures (CI) – are defined by their vast, multi-level interactions and emergent behaviors, but this elaborate web of interactions often conceals relationships. For instance, CI is often reduced to technological components, ignoring that social and ecological components are also embedded, leading to unintentional consequences from disturbance events. Analysis of CI as social-ecological-technological systems (SETS) can support integrated decision-making and increase infrastructure’s capacity for resilience to climate change. We assess the impacts of an extreme precipitation event in Phoenix, AZ to identify pathways of disruption and feedback loops across SETS as presented in an illustrative causal loop diagram, developed through semi-structured interviews with researchers and practitioners and cross-validated with a literature review. The causal loop diagram consists of 19 components resulting in hundreds of feedback loops and cascading failures, with surface runoff, infiltration, and water bodies as well as power, water, and transportation infrastructures appearing to have critical roles in maintaining system services. We found that pathways of disruptions highlight potential weak spots within the system that could benefit from climate adaptation, and feedback loops may serve as potential tools to divert failure at the root cause. This method of convergence research shows potential as a useful tool to illustrate a broader perspective of urban systems and address the increasing complexity and uncertainty of the Anthropocene. © The Author(s) 2023.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Effects of Extreme Disturbance Events: From Ecesis to Social-Ecological-Technological Systems
    Lugo, Ariel E.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (08) : 1726 - 1747
  • [2] Archetypes of social-ecological-technological systems for managing ecological infrastructure
    Wicki, Sergio
    Black, Benjamin
    Kurmann, Manuel
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [3] Social-ecological-technological systems consequences of mining: An analytical framework for more holistic impact assessments
    Nilsson, Annika E.
    Avango, Dag
    Rosqvist, Gunhild
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 8 (04):
  • [4] Governing sustainable transformations of urban social-ecological-technological systems
    Krueger, Elisabeth H.
    Constantino, Sara M.
    Centeno, Miguel A.
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Weber, Elke U.
    Levin, Simon A.
    NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [5] Governing sustainable transformations of urban social-ecological-technological systems
    Elisabeth H. Krueger
    Sara M. Constantino
    Miguel A. Centeno
    Thomas Elmqvist
    Elke U. Weber
    Simon A. Levin
    npj Urban Sustainability, 2
  • [6] Resilience of urban social-ecological-technological systems (SETS): A review
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 99
  • [7] A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services
    McPhearson, Timon
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Berbes-Blazquez, Marta
    Cheng, Chingwen
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    Anderson, Erik
    Barbosa, Olga
    Chandler, David G.
    Chang, Heeju
    V. Chester, Mikhail
    Childers, Daniel L.
    Elser, Stephen R.
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Grabowski, Zbigniew
    Groffman, Peter
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Iwaniec, David M.
    Kabisch, Nadja
    Kennedy, Christopher
    Markolf, Samuel A.
    Matsler, A. Marissa
    McPhillips, Lauren E.
    Miller, Thaddeus R.
    Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
    Rosi, Emma
    Troxler, Tiffany G.
    ONE EARTH, 2022, 5 (05): : 505 - 518
  • [8] Does the ecological concept of disturbance have utility in urban social-ecological-technological systems?
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    Pickett, Steward T. A.
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Cadenasso, Mary L.
    ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 3 (01)
  • [9] Smarter greener cities through a social-ecological-technological systems approach
    Branny, Artur
    Moller, Maja Steen
    Korpilo, Silviya
    McPhearson, Timon
    Gulsrud, Natalie
    Olafsson, Anton Stahl
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Andersson, Erik
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 55
  • [10] Algorithms as Social-Ecological-Technological Systems: an Environmental Justice Lens on Algorithmic Audits
    Rakova, Bogdana
    Dobbe, Roel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2023, 2023, : 491 - 491