Chromium electroplating from trivalent chromium baths as an environmentally friendly alternative to hazardous hexavalent chromium baths: comparative study on advantages and disadvantages

被引:0
|
作者
V. S. Protsenko
F. I. Danilov
机构
[1] Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology,
关键词
Trivalent chromium; Electroplating; Electrodeposition; Nanocrystalline coating;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this communication, we present a generalization of our investigations concerning current state in the development of trivalent chromium baths as an environmentally friendly alternative to hazardous electroplating baths containing extremely toxic hexavalent chromium compounds. The main technological properties of sulfate trivalent chromium baths containing carbamide and formic acid as organic additives are described and compared to those typical of common Cr(VI) plating bath. It is shown that thick nanocrystalline chromium–carbon deposits may be obtained from the Cr(III) electrolytes under study, with some physicochemical and service properties of such coatings exceeding those of “usual” chromium deposits. The proposed trivalent chromium baths are distinguished by their high current efficiency and electrodeposition rate. The covering power of the Cr(III) baths is poorer than in case of hexavalent chromium baths; it may be improved by applying basic chromium sulfate (chrome tanning agent) instead of chromium sulfate as a source of Cr(III) ions in solution. There is no need to utilize toxic lead anodes in Cr(III) deposition processes. It is noted that a grave shortcoming of trivalent baths is their low conductivity in comparison with the hexavalent ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1206
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chromium electroplating from trivalent chromium baths as an environmentally friendly alternative to hazardous hexavalent chromium baths: comparative study on advantages and disadvantages
    Protsenko, V. S.
    Danilov, F. I.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2014, 16 (06) : 1201 - 1206
  • [2] TRIVALENT CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING FOR BATHS CONTAINING HYPOPHOSPHITE IONS
    HWANG, JY
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1991, 78 (05): : 118 - &
  • [3] DETERMINATION OF TRIVALENT AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IONS AND IMPURITIES IN TRIVALENT CHROMIUM BATHS BY DIFFERENTIAL PULSE POLAROGRAPHY
    HSIEH, AK
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1990, 77 (10): : 58 - 61
  • [4] Why functional trivalent chromium fails and hexavalent chromium is environmentally friendly
    Shuker, I
    Newby, KR
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF METAL FINISHING, 2005, 83 (06): : 272 - 274
  • [5] ELECTRODEPOSITION OF CHROMIUM-IRON ALLOYS FROM TRIVALENT CHROMIUM BATHS
    HAYASHI, T
    ISHIHAMA, A
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1979, 66 (09): : 36 - 40
  • [6] PURIFICATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM PLATING BATHS
    KNILL, EC
    CHESSIN, H
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1986, 73 (08): : 26 - 32
  • [7] CONTAMINATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM PLATING BATHS
    KNILL, EC
    CHESSIN, H
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1986, 73 (07): : 24 - 29
  • [8] Pulse plating of hard chromium from trivalent baths
    Song, YB
    Chin, DT
    [J]. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 2000, 87 (09): : 80 - +
  • [9] Analyses of chromium deposit as criteria for the selection of trivalent chromium plating baths
    Hsieh, An-Kong
    Chen, Keng-Nam
    Chung, Mui-Fatt
    [J]. Metal Finishing, 1993, 91 (02) : 45 - 47
  • [10] Chromium coatings from trivalent chromium plating baths: Characterization and cathodic delamination behaviour
    Prabhakar, J. Manoj
    Varanasi, Rama Srinivas
    da Silva, Caue Correa
    Saba
    Vooys, Arnoud de
    Erbe, Andreas
    Rohwerder, Michael
    [J]. CORROSION SCIENCE, 2021, 187