The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance

被引:0
|
作者
Miriam Gade
Marco Steinhauser
机构
[1] Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt,Department of Psychology
[2] Medical School Berlin,Faculty of Sciences
来源
Psychological Research | 2020年 / 84卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cues help in retrieving and implementing task-sets, that are actual representations of the to-be performed task in working memory. However, whereas previous studies revealed that the effectiveness of selecting and implementing task-sets based on cues depends on the type of cue (i.e., transparent words vs. arbitrary shapes), it is still unclear which characteristics of cues are responsible for these differences and whether the impact of the cue is bound to task-set retrieval only or also impacts task-set representations. For instance, the amount of interference during actual task performance has been reported to alter dependent on cue type as do preparation gains such as the reduction of switch cost. To investigate the effectiveness of cue characteristics (i.e., cue transparency and cue format), we manipulated those within- and between-participants in three experiments. Main dependent measures were switch costs in reaction times and error rates that occur when participants have to switch task-sets, and thus update working memory content. Our results consistently show beneficial effects of transparent cues for the reduction of switch cost. The influence of cue format was manifest in within-participants manipulation only and was mainly found in error rates. Overall, our data suggest that the amount of interference experienced in actual task performance can be significantly modulated dependent on cue type, suggesting flexible adaptation of the cognitive system to contextual information.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1369
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance
    Gade, Miriam
    Steinhauser, Marco
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2020, 84 (05): : 1346 - 1369
  • [2] Task switching is not cue switching
    Altmann, Erik M.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (06) : 1016 - 1022
  • [3] Task switching is not cue switching
    Erik M. Altmann
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006, 13 : 1016 - 1022
  • [4] Cue-task associations in task switching
    Gade, Miriam
    Koch, Iring
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (06): : 762 - 769
  • [5] Cue Onset Asynchrony in Task Switching
    Bialkova, Svetlana Evt.
    de Haan, Ab
    Schriefers, Herbert J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2004, : 1526 - 1526
  • [6] Components of task switching: A closer look at task switching and cue switching
    Schmitz, Florian
    Voss, Andreas
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 151 : 184 - 196
  • [7] The Neural Oscillation of Cue Retrieving in the Task Switching
    Wang, Yu
    Chen, Chen
    Gao, Junfeng
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 93 - 94
  • [8] A Review of the Role of Cue Processing in Task Switching
    Jost, Kerstin
    De Baene, Wouter
    Koch, Iring
    Brass, Marcel
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 221 (01): : 5 - 14
  • [9] Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    James A. Grange
    George Houghton
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2010, 74 : 481 - 490
  • [10] Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange, James A.
    Houghton, George
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (05): : 481 - 490