Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: a randomized phase II trial—an update

被引:0
|
作者
Rasha Haggag
Kamel Farag
Fouad Abu-Taleb
Sameh Shamaa
Abdel-Rahman Zekri
Tarek ELBolkainy
Hussein Khaled
机构
[1] Zagazig University,Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Mansoura University,Oncology Center, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Cairo University,Department of Cancer Biology, National Cancer Institute
[4] Cairo University,Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute
[5] Cairo University,Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute
来源
Medical Oncology | 2014年 / 31卷
关键词
Bladder cancer; Prolonged infusion; Low-dose gemcitabine; Cisplatin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prolonged infusion of low-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) proved to be an effective treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer. One hundred and twenty untreated patients with stage III/IV bladder cancer were randomized to receive either gemcitabine (250 mg/m2) 6-h infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 every 21-day cycle (arm 1) or gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2) 30-min infusion on days 1 and 8, with the same dose of cisplatin (arm 2). The 92 males and 28 females included in the study had a median age of 62 years (range 40–85 years). Among the 120 patient, complete response was achieved in 11.7 % (7/60 patients of arm 1) and 5 % (3/60 patients of arm 2). Eighteen patients in arm 1 (30 %) and 17 patients (28.3 %) in arm 2 had partial response on therapy. Thus, the overall response rate of patients in arm 1 and arm 2 was 41.7 % (25/60 patients) and 33.3 % (20/60 patients), respectively (p = 0.37). No significant difference in median time to disease progression (26 vs. 24 months, p = 0.4), median survival (12 vs. 16 months, p = 0.8), and 1-year survival (49.9 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.8) was detected between arms 1 and 2, respectively. Main toxicities were similar in both arms with no statistically significant differences. Low-dose, prolonged infusion gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin is not inferior to the standard GC regimen with favorable toxicity profile and less financial costs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: a randomized phase II trial-an update
    Haggag, Rasha
    Farag, Kamel
    Abu-Taleb, Fouad
    Shamaa, Sameh
    Zekri, Abdel-Rahman
    ELBolkainy, Tarek
    Khaled, Hussein
    [J]. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 31 (01)
  • [2] Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: A randomized phase II trial: An update.
    Haggag, Rasha Mohamed
    Farag, Kamel
    Abu-Taleb, Fouad
    Shamaa, Sameh
    Zekri, Abdel-Rahman
    ELBolkainy, Tarek
    Khaled, Hussein Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [3] Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: A randomized phase II trial
    Khaled, H.
    Abu-Taleb, F.
    Haggag, R.
    Zekri, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [4] A phase II trial of low dose prolonged infusion gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced bladder cancer
    Khaled, Hussein M.
    El-Khodary, Ahmed I.
    Emara, Mohamed E.
    Gaafar, Rabab M.
    Mansour, Osman
    Warith, Amed Abdei
    Zaghloul, Mohamed S.
    El Malt, Osama
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 : 118 - 118
  • [5] Primary chemotherapy with low-dose prolonged infusion gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer: A Phase II trial
    Khaled, Hussein
    Emara, Mohamed E.
    Gaafar, Rabab M.
    Mansour, Osman
    Warith, Ahmed Abdel
    Zaghloul, Mohamed S.
    El Malt, Osama
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2008, 26 (02) : 133 - 136
  • [6] Low-dose gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel versus standard-dose gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A randomized Phase II trial
    Kamata, Ken
    Imai, Hajime
    Matsumoto, Hisakazu
    Yamashita, Yukitaka
    Kato, Takao
    Nishi, Katsuhisa
    Omoto, Shunsuke
    Minaga, Kosuke
    Yamao, Kentaro
    Hyodo, Tomoko
    Im, Sung-Woon
    Hara, Akane
    Yoshikawa, Tomoe
    Ishikawa, Rei
    Okamoto, Ayana
    Yamazaki, Tomohiro
    Nakai, Atsushi
    Ueshima, Kazuomi
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    Takenaka, Mamoru
    Watanabe, Tomohiro
    Kitano, Masayuki
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    [J]. JGH OPEN, 2023, 7 (09): : 659 - 666
  • [7] Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose gemcitabine regimens in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective randomized trial
    Sakamoto, H
    Kitano, M
    Suetomi, Y
    Takeyama, Y
    Ohyanagi, H
    Nakai, T
    Yasuda, C
    Kudo, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 41 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [8] Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose gemcitabine regimens in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective randomized trial
    Hiroki Sakamoto
    Masayuki Kitano
    Yoichirou Suetomi
    Yoshifumi Takeyama
    Harumasa Ohyanagi
    Takuya Nakai
    Chikao Yasuda
    Masatoshi Kudo
    [J]. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 41 : 70 - 76
  • [9] Phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Xiong, Jian Ping
    Feng, Miao
    Qiu, Feng
    Xu, Jun
    Tao, Qing Song
    Zhang, Ling
    Xiang, Xiao Jun
    Zhong, Lu Xing
    Yu, Feng
    Ma, Xu Tian
    Gong, Wang Yong
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2008, 60 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [10] A phase II trial of prolonged, continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma
    Oscar Arrieta
    Diego López-Macías
    Víctor-Osvaldo Mendoza-García
    Ludwing Bacon-Fonseca
    Wendy Muñoz-Montaño
    Eleazar-Omar Macedo-Pérez
    Saé Muñiz-Hernández
    Monika Blake-Cerda
    José-Francisco Corona-Cruz
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 73 : 975 - 982