Robotic technology for colorectal surgery. Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges - German version

被引:2
|
作者
Spinoglio, G. [1 ]
Bellora, P. [2 ]
Monni, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] AOU Maggiore della Carita Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Robot Surg, Corso Mazzini 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
[2] Maggiore della Carita Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Novara, Italy
来源
CHIRURG | 2016年 / 87卷 / 08期
关键词
Robotics surgical procedures; Fluorescence; Lymphadenectomy; Colectomy; Rectal cancer; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; TERM ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC-SURGERY; INDOCYANINE GREEN; FLUORESCENCE; LIGATION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00104-016-0238-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Current treatment approaches are multidisciplinary, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Several studies have reported an improvement in surgical techniques and in new devices facilitating better pre- and intraoperative staging. Since its first application in 2002, robotic surgery has progressed steadily, offering good surgical results and better oncological outcomes. Currently, many studies and reviews have confirmed its safety and feasibility for colorectal cancer. Robotic technology simplifies surgical maneuvers thanks to the three-dimensional magnification and stable vision, convenient mobility of the robotic arms, endowrist instruments with seven degrees of freedom, ambidextrous capability, tremor filtering and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Regarding the oncological outcome, the robotic technique is equivalent to the laparoscopic approach; however, a lower recurrence rate has been achieved with the robotic approach in extended lymphadenectomy as part of complete mesocolic excision for right colonic cancer and total mesorectal excision for low rectal tumors. Colorectal robotic surgery has progressively improved worldwide. Its advantages are related not only to better oncological outcomes, but also to improvements in terms of detection, accurate diagnosis and staging.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 668
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Robotic technology for colorectal surgery Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges
    Spinoglio, G.
    Bellora, P.
    Monni, M.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2017, 88 : 29 - 33
  • [2] Robotic technology for colorectal surgery: Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges; [Robotertechnologie in der kolorektalen Chirurgie: Verfahren, aktuelle Anwendung und künftige innovative Herausforderungen]
    Spinoglio G.
    Bellora P.
    Monni M.
    [J]. Der Chirurg, 2017, 88 (Suppl 1): : 29 - 33
  • [3] Robotic colorectal surgery. Current status and future developments
    Jayne, D.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2013, 84 (08): : 635 - 642
  • [4] Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version
    Gonzalez-Ciccarelli, L. F.
    Quadri, P.
    Daskalaki, D.
    Milone, L.
    Gangemi, A.
    Giulianotti, P. C.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (08): : 651 - 662
  • [6] Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments
    Stueer, Carsten
    Ringel, Florian
    Stoffel, Michael
    Reinke, Andreas
    Behr, Michael
    Meyer, Bernhard
    [J]. INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGING, 2011, 109 : 241 - 245
  • [7] ROBOTIC SURGERY. CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND NEW TRENDS
    Di Matteo, Giorgio
    [J]. GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2015, 36 (01): : 40 - 41
  • [8] Current Status and Future of Robotic Colorectal Surgery
    Marecik, Slawomir
    Kochar, Kunal
    Park, John J.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (09) : 1025 - 1027
  • [9] DIFFUSION OF TECHNOLOGY: TRENDS IN ROBOTIC-ASSISTED COLORECTAL SURGERY.
    Damle, A.
    Damle, R.
    Ma, D.
    Flahive, J.
    Davids, J.
    Sturrock, P.
    Maykel, J.
    Alavi, K.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E360 - E361
  • [10] Overview of robotic colorectal surgery: Current and future practical developments
    Roy, Sudipta
    Evans, Charles
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (02): : 143 - 150