Project portfolio selection for construction contractors by MCDM–GIS approach

被引:0
|
作者
A. Hashemizadeh
Y. Ju
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
关键词
Project portfolio; Portfolio management; Strategy–project orientation; Multi-criteria decision-making; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Effective decision-making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, project portfolio selection (PPS) is considered as one of the main steps in project portfolio management (PPM). PPS which depends on different criteria such as strategic, financial, as well as project specifications is also suggested for construction contractors. Although it is difficult to consider all these criteria, the decision will be inaccurate when some of them are ignored. The most common multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies and geographic information system (GIS) are combined as a method, by which the potential projects obtain a strategic score by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Then, they are ranked according to technical criteria by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The proposed approach includes three ordinal phases. First, scoring potential projects due to the company strategy is conducted by the AHP to determine strategic-aligned projects (SAPs). Then, SAPs are ranked by TOPSIS. Finally, the final GIS sheet is prepared by the obtained technical score and communal criteria. This paper provides a clear and comprehensive insight to accept or reject SAPs by form a weighted sheet in GIS. It suggests that CCs select project portfolio according to all the financial and non-financial criteria. This approach can satisfy the PPM principals and resolve some of the shortcomings related to MCDM methods by GIS capacities to reduce complexity so that the decision-makers form project portfolios easily and effectively. This approach is described in a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:8283 / 8296
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Project portfolio selection for construction contractors by MCDM-GIS approach
    Hashemizadeh, A.
    Ju, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 16 (12) : 8283 - 8296
  • [2] A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Strategic Project Portfolio Selection of Agro By-Products
    Debnath, Animesh
    Roy, Jagannath
    Kar, Samarjit
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [3] Project Portfolio Selection: A Newsvendor Approach
    Hu, Qiaohai
    Szmerekovsky, Joseph
    DECISION SCIENCES, 2017, 48 (01) : 176 - 199
  • [4] An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization
    Ehrgott, M
    Klamroth, K
    Schwehm, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 155 (03) : 752 - 770
  • [5] Project portfolio selection model, a realistic approach
    Urli, Bruno
    Terrien, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 17 (06) : 809 - 826
  • [6] Project portfolio selection with scheduling: an evolutionary approach
    Martinez-Vega, Daniel A.
    Cruz-Reyes, Laura
    Rangel, Nelson, V
    Gomez S, Claudia G.
    Sanchez S, Patricia
    Perez, Mercedes, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 10 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [7] Project Portfolio Selection Using Interactive Approach
    Nowak, Maciej
    MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, 2013, 57 : 814 - 822
  • [8] Assessing the role and significance of project selection by the contractors in the Saudi construction industry
    Bageis, Abdulrahman
    Alsulamy, Saleh
    ORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 13 (01): : 2367 - 2373
  • [9] Improving portfolio liquidity: MCDM approach to share selection on the Zagreb Stock Exchange
    Kovac, Dujam
    Podrug, Doris
    CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2023, 14 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [10] Multicriteria selection of construction contractors. Neural network approach
    Bendano-Jacome, Ricardo
    del Cano-Gochi, Alfredo
    de la Cruz-Lopez, Pilar
    Castro-Rascado, Alberto
    DYNA, 2010, 85 (01): : 71 - 84