Strategy-proofness and markets

被引:0
|
作者
Mark A. Satterthwaite
机构
[1] Kellogg Graduate School of Management,
[2] Northwestern University,undefined
[3] Evanston,undefined
[4] IL 60208,undefined
[5] USA (e-mail: m-satterthwaite@nwu.edu),undefined
来源
Social Choice and Welfare | 2001年 / 18卷
关键词
Social Choice; Incomplete Information; Choice Function; Substantial Body; Social Choice Function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
If a market is considered to be a social choice function, then the domain of admissible preferences is restricted and standard social choice theorems do not apply. A substantial body of analysis, however, strongly supports the notion that attractive strategy-proof social choice functions do not exist in market settings. Yet price theory, which implicitly assumes the strategy-proofness of markets, performs quite well in describing many real markets. This paper resolves this paradox in two steps. First, given that a market is not strategy-proof, it should be modeled as a Bayesian game of incomplete information. Second, a double auction market, which is perhaps the simplest operationalization of supply and demand as a Bayesian game, is approximately strategy-proof even when the number of traders on each side of the market is quite moderate.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 58
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategy-proofness and markets
    Satterthwaite, MA
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2001, 18 (01) : 37 - 58
  • [2] Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets
    Guillen, Pablo
    Veszteg, Robert F.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (02) : 650 - 668
  • [3] Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets
    Pablo Guillen
    Róbert F. Veszteg
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2021, 24 : 650 - 668
  • [4] A decomposition of strategy-proofness
    Nozomu Muto
    Shin Sato
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2016, 47 : 277 - 294
  • [5] A decomposition of strategy-proofness
    Muto, Nozomu
    Sato, Shin
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2016, 47 (02) : 277 - 294
  • [6] Strategy-proofness in the Large
    Azevedo, Eduardo M.
    Budish, Eric
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01): : 81 - 116
  • [7] Evaluationwise strategy-proofness
    Erdamar, Bora
    Sanver, M. Remzi
    Sato, Shin
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2017, 106 : 227 - 238
  • [8] On the equivalence of strategy-proofness and upper contour strategy-proofness for randomized social choice functions
    Roy, Souvik
    Sadhukhan, Soumyarup
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 99
  • [9] Strategy-proofness and weighted voting
    Campbell, Donald E.
    Kelly, Jerry S.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2010, 60 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [10] Strategy-proofness on Euclidean spaces
    W. Peremans
    H. Peters
    H. v. d. Stel
    T. Storcken
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 1997, 14 : 379 - 401