Sustainability assessment of autumn and spring potato production systems using extended exergy analysis (EEA)

被引:0
|
作者
Hamid Reza Shahhoseini
Mahmoud Ramroudi
Hossein Kazemi
Zahra Amiri
机构
[1] University of Zabol,Department of Agronomy
[2] Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (GUASNR),Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Plant Production
来源
关键词
Cumulative exergy consumption (CExC); Environmental remediation cost (EE; ); Ecological sustainability; Economic efficiency; Optimal consumption;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The unreasonable use of inputs, including chemical fertilizers and pesticides, has put agricultural production at risk of unsustainability in many areas. Extended exergy analysis (EEA) is an innovative method for assessing the ecological sustainability of agricultural ecosystems. EEA allows for a comprehensive assessment of the material and immaterial flows in the system and, as a result, a more accurate assessment of sustainability. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of the sustainability of autumn and spring potato systems was performed based on the EEA approach in Golestan Province in Iran during the crop year of 2017–2018. for this purpose, 120 and 60 farms were taken into account for the autumn and spring farming systems, respectively. The extended exergy (EE) values of autumn and spring potato crops in Golestan Province were 2.30E + 05 and 1.68E + 05 MJ ha−1, respectively. The highest shares of EE in both autumn (57.00%) and spring (48.64%) crops were related to cumulative exergy consumption (CExC). The excessive consumption of inputs in the autumn system led to enhanced CExC. The exergy of environmental remediation cost (EEE) for the spring farming system (7.84E + 04 MJ ha−1) was lower than that of the autumn farming system (9.20E + 04 MJ ha−1), which was mainly due to the high consumption of inputs like diesel fuel in the latter system. Accordingly, the ecological sustainability of the spring farming system was greater than that of the autumn farming system. The values of capital conversion factor (Kcap) for material and energy inputs to the autumn and spring farming systems were 0.011 and 0.014 US$ MJ−1, respectively, which indicated that potato production in Golestan Province was more costly in the spring farming system. The values of the specific capital conversion factor of product sales (KcapEE) for the autumn and spring potato systems were 0.006 and 0.005 US$ MJ−1, respectively. Therefore, the economic efficiency of the autumn farming system was higher than that of the spring farming system. Also, the Extended Exergy Efficiency Indices (I]EE) for the autumn and spring potato production systems were 45 and 37%, respectively, which represented the higher thermodynamic efficiency of the autumn farming system. The cumulative degrees of perfection for the autumn and spring potato systems were 0.78 and 0.77, respectively, which demonstrated the more optimal use of energy and materials in the autumn compared to the spring farming system. Based on the results obtained in this research, it is recommended to improve management models including selections of appropriate types and amounts of input consumptions corresponding to the systems so as to reduce costs and ameliorate thermodynamic-economic indices.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability assessment of autumn and spring potato production systems using extended exergy analysis (EEA)
    Shahhoseini, Hamid Reza
    Ramroudi, Mahmoud
    Kazemi, Hossein
    Amiri, Zahra
    ENERGY ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 7 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [2] Evaluating ecological sustainability of mechanized and traditional systems of damaskrose production using extended exergy analysis
    Nakhaii, Fatemeh
    Ghanbari, Seyed Ahmad
    Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza
    Seyedabadi, Esmaeel
    Sciubba, Enrico
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 488
  • [3] Performance assessment of a wind power plant using standard exergy and extended exergy accounting (EEA) approaches
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    Hosseini, Seyed Sina
    Dashti, Behrouz B.
    Soufiyan, Mohamad Mojarab
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 171 : 127 - 136
  • [4] Extended Exergy Analysis (EEA) of Italy, 2013-2017
    Biondi, Alfonso
    Sciubba, Enrico
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (10)
  • [5] Exergy analysis in the assessment of the sustainability of waste gas treatment systems
    Dewulf, J
    Van Langenhove, H
    Dirckx, J
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 273 (1-3) : 41 - 52
  • [6] Sustainability assessment of salmonid feed using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis
    Draganovic, Vukasin
    Jorgensen, Sven Erik
    Boom, Remko
    Jonkers, Jan
    Riesen, Guido
    van der Goot, Atze Jan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 34 : 277 - 289
  • [7] Exergetic cost analysis and sustainability assessment of various low exergy heating systems
    Balta, M. Tolga
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 55 : 721 - 727
  • [8] Sustainability analysis of a solar driven hydrogen production system using exergy, extended exergy, and thermo-ecological methods: Proposing and comparing of new indices
    Erzen, Sevgi
    Unal, Canberk
    Acikkalp, Emin
    Hepbasli, Arif
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 236
  • [9] Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the Extended Exergy Accounting method
    Rocco, M. V.
    Colombo, E.
    Sciubba, E.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 : 1405 - 1420
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of sugarcane and sugar beet production systems by energy and exergy approaches: a case study
    Asakereh, Abbas
    Kiani, Mostafa Kiani Deh
    Soleymani, Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2023, 40 (01) : 74 - 90