EQ-5D in a general population survey – A description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36

被引:0
|
作者
A. Nordlund
K. Ekberg
M. Kristenson
Linquest Group
机构
[1] Linköping University,National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Department of Health and Society
[2] County Council of Östergötland,Centre for Public Health Sciences
[3] Linköping University,Division of Social Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Department of Health and Society
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2005年 / 14卷
关键词
EQ-5D; Health survey; Health status measurement; Population surveillance; SF-36;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The importance of studying health-related quality of life in the general population has increasingly been emphasized. From a public health perspective, this benefits the identification of population inequalities in health status. One of the currently most popular instruments is the EQ-5D. Evaluations of the EQ-5D generally focus on the overall preference-based index. As this index has a built-in value, exploration of the information from the underlying health states is also important. In this study, the ten most commonly reported EQ-5D health states are described using the SF-36. Data collected in 1999 by questionnaires mailed to a random sample aged 20–74 in south-eastern Sweden were used (n = 9489). Almost 43% reported the best possible EQ-5D health state and 78% were accounted for by three EQ-5D health states. The EQ-5D health state classification was largely reflected by the SF-36, with the EQ-5D items mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression tapping most clearly on the SF-36 scales physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, and mental health, respectively. However, within the same level of EQ-5D (i.e., moderate problems) there was a rather large variation of SF-36 scale scores, particularly regarding the EQ-5D item pain/discomfort and the SF-36 scale BP.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1109
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EQ-5D in a general population survey - A description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36
    Nordlund, A
    Ekberg, K
    Kristenson, M
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (04) : 1099 - 1109
  • [2] SF-36 and EQ-5D in adult ICU patients
    Smith, S
    Brazier, JE
    Parry, G
    Edbrooke, DL
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 : S176 - S176
  • [3] THE VALIDITY OF ESTIMATING EQ-5D SCORES FROM THE HAQ AND SF-36
    Harrison, Mark
    Watson, Kath
    Bansback, Nick
    Verstappen, Suzanne
    Symmons, Deborah
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 48 : I111 - I112
  • [4] Summarizing population health using EQ-5D
    Chuang, L. H.
    Kind, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A205 - A205
  • [5] Converting SF-36 into EQ-5D: Designed to succeed or calculated to fail?
    Chuang, LH
    Kind, P
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (03) : A63 - A64
  • [6] Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 in untreated patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication
    Vaidya, Anil
    Kleinegris, Marie-Claire
    Severens, Johan L.
    Ramaekers, Bram L.
    ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J.
    ten Cate, Hugo
    Joore, Manuela A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (06) : 535 - 548
  • [7] Mapping SF-36 onto the EQ-5D index: how reliable is the relationship?
    Donna Rowen
    John Brazier
    Jennifer Roberts
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7
  • [8] Comparison of Euroqol EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
    Myers, C
    Wilks, D
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (1-2) : 9 - 16
  • [9] Mapping SF-36 onto the EQ-5D index: how reliable is the relationship?
    Rowen, Donna
    Brazier, John
    Roberts, Jennifer
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2009, 7
  • [10] Comparison of Euroqol EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
    C. Myers
    D. Wilks
    Quality of Life Research, 1999, 8 : 9 - 16