Are there asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices? Testing for threshold effects of US real interest rates and adjusted wheat, corn, and soybean prices

被引:0
|
作者
Bente Castro Campos
机构
[1] Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,Department of Agricultural Economics, ETSIAAB
[2] Research Centre for the Management of Agricultural and Environmental Risks (CEIGRAM),Institute of Agricultural Economics
[3] University of Kiel,undefined
来源
Empirical Economics | 2020年 / 59卷
关键词
Negative real interest rates; Agricultural commodity prices; Fixed-effect panel threshold model; E43; Q002; C24;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article analyzes whether there are asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices using quarterly data of US interest rates and agricultural commodity prices over the period of 1983q1–2014q4. While the literature has identified statistically significant negative relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices, this article extends the analysis by testing for threshold effects using Hansen’s (J Econom 93(2):345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1, 1999) fixed-effect panel threshold model and testing procedure. The empirical results indicate that real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices follow a U-shaped relationship, with − 1.45 being the turning point from negative to positive effects. Specifically, if real interest rates below the threshold of − 1.45 are increased by 1%, agricultural commodity prices will decrease by 8.1%, and if real interest rates are equal or above − 1.45 and are increased by 1%, agricultural commodity prices will increase by 3.4%. As the literature suggests an inverse proportional relation between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices, a theoretical explanation for this phenomenon has yet to be found but is probably related to assumptions about market participants’ expectations and risk behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 394
页数:23
相关论文
共 25 条