Prolegomena to social studies of digital innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Jadranka Švarc
机构
[1] Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences,
来源
AI & SOCIETY | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Digital innovation; Conceptual framework; Science technology and innovation (STI) studies; Social studies of innovation; Digital transformation; Social inequality; Digital entrepreneurialism; Digital monopolies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rise of the digital economy, in terms of digital innovation (DI), requires the reconsideration of the notion of innovation to clarify its conceptualisation in a post–industrial digital economy. The current science, technology, innovation (STI), and social studies of innovation are lacking conceptual, theoretical, and analytical grounds for the exploration of DI, despite their pervasive impact on our lives. The aim of this study is to provide a conceptual framework for the exploration of DI, driven by growing recognition of the fact that the concept of innovation is faced with contemporary crises due to the theoretical and analytical limits of industrial innovation when adapting to socio-economic changes. This article discusses the ways in which intrinsic features of DI differentiate from industrial innovation, constructing the concept of DI around its two distinctive features: raising social inequality through four selected mechanisms and disrupting business models with ambivalent consequences. These characteristics have been identified to be the most intriguing when attempting to understand the nature of DI in today’s digital society. This research applies an intersectional and interdisciplinary approach, allowing for a critical and qualitative analysis of the current concepts of DI in different scientific fields and their convergence into a common theoretical ground for the social science of DI.
引用
收藏
页码:1323 / 1335
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prolegomena to social studies of digital innovation
    Svarc, Jadranka
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 (04) : 1323 - 1335
  • [2] Designing a Digital Social Innovation Platform: From Case Studies to Concepts
    Dinant, Ines
    Floch, Jacqueline
    Vilarinho, Thomas
    Oliveira, Manuel
    [J]. INTERNET SCIENCE, 2017, 10673 : 101 - 118
  • [3] Prolegomena to Social Mechanics
    Voegelin
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFT UND SOZIALPOLITIK, 1923, 51 (02): : 540 - 541
  • [4] Prolegomena to digital communication ethics
    Arnautu, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS AND IDEOLOGIES, 2006, (13) : 23 - 31
  • [5] Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?
    van der Have, Robert P.
    Rubalcaba, Luis
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) : 1923 - 1935
  • [6] DIGITAL SOCIAL INNOVATION: TAIWAN CAN HELP
    Tang, Audrey
    [J]. 2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID-STATE SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND MICROSYSTEMS (TRANSDUCERS), 2021, : 394 - 394
  • [7] Digital social innovation: An overview and research framework
    Qureshi, Israr
    Pan, Shan L.
    Zheng, Yingqin
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2021, 31 (05) : 647 - 671
  • [8] Crowdmapping Digital Social Innovation with Linked Data
    Halpin, Harry
    Bria, Francesca
    [J]. SEMANTIC WEB: LATEST ADVANCES AND NEW DOMAINS, ESWC 2015, 2015, 9088 : 606 - 620
  • [9] DIGITAL SOCIAL INNOVATION AND LABOR MARKET TRANSFORMATIONS
    Marzano, Gilberto
    [J]. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION, VOL IV: SPECIAL PEDAGOGY, SOCIAL PEDAGOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION, 2020, : 301 - 308
  • [10] PROLEGOMENA TO A THEORY OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
    PARSONS, T
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (03) : 319 - 333