Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects

被引:0
|
作者
Arnaud Fumal
Valentin Bohotin
Michel Vandenheede
Laurence Seidel
Victor De Pasqua
Alain Maertens de Noordhout
Jean Schoenen
机构
[1] CHR Citadelle Hospital,University Department of Neurology
[2] University of Liège,Department of Neuroanatomy
[3] University of Liège,Department of Medical Informatics, CHU Hospital
来源
关键词
rTMS; Healthy subjects; Visual cortex; Visual evoked potentials; Habituation; Reproducibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a previous comparative study with migraineurs, we found in 24 normal subjects that the amplitude of the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) in the first block of 100 responses and its habituation over 6 sequential blocks were significantly decreased after 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while 10 Hz rTMS had no significant effect. We report here our results on the reproducibility of the rTMS effect studied in ten of these subjects by repeating the recordings for each frequency three times on different days. We have also reanalysed the data obtained in 24 normal subjects, looking separately at the results in those stimulated at an intensity equal to phosphene threshold (group 1; n=14) and those stimulated at 110% of motor threshold because of unelicitable phosphenes (group 2; n=10). We finally determined the precise duration of the rTMS effect. Despite some interindividual variability, the effects of both rTMS frequencies on first block amplitude, habituation between first and sixth block and habituation slope over the six blocks were highly reproducible. The only difference between the two groups of subjects was the effect of 1 Hz rTMS on the second measured PR-VEP component. Whereas first block amplitude of the first P1-N1 component and habituation were decreased in both groups, such a decrease was found for the second P1-N2 component only in group 1 stimulated at phosphene threshold. The dishabituation of the N1-P1 component after 1 Hz rTMS was maximal at 15 min, but lasted up to 33 min, while that of P1-N2 disappeared after 3 min. There was a non-significant trend (p=0.06) for a reduction of first block amplitude after 10 Hz rTMS in the total group of subjects, but no effect on habituation. The inhibitory effect of 1 Hz rTMS, which reduces in healthy controls both first block PR-VEP amplitude and habituation, probably by decreasing the preactivation excitability level of the underlying visual cortex, is thus reproducible and long lasting. Long trains of 10 Hz rTMS tend to attenuate reproducibly the cortical preactivation level in normal subjects, but they do not affect habituation at all, which contrasts with their effect in migraineurs, in whom, as previously reported, they significantly correct the habituation deficit. The absence of an effect of 1 Hz rTMS on PR-VEP P1-N2 in subjects stimulated at 110% of motor threshold may be explained by the deeper anatomical location of the cortical generators of this component and the lower stimulation intensity used. Taken together our results confirm that the effect of rTMS on the underlying cortex depends on several variables such as frequency, intensity and level of cortical preactivation.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects
    Fumal, A
    Bohotin, V
    Vandenheede, M
    Seidel, L
    De Pasqua, V
    de Noordhout, AM
    Schoenen, J
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 150 (03) : 332 - 340
  • [2] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects
    Arnaud Fumal
    Valentin Bohotin
    Michel Vandenheede
    Laurence Seidel
    Victor De Pasqua
    Alain Maertens de Noordhout
    Jean Schoenen
    Experimental Brain Research, 2003, 151 : 426 - 426
  • [3] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials: new insights in healthy subjects (vol 150, pg 332, 2003)
    Fumal, A
    Bohotin, V
    Vandenheede, M
    Seidel, L
    De Pasqua, V
    de Noordhout, AM
    Schoenen, J
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 151 (03) : 426 - 426
  • [4] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine
    Bohotin, V
    Fumal, A
    Vandenheede, M
    Gérard, P
    Bohotin, C
    de Noordhout, AM
    Schoenen, J
    BRAIN, 2002, 125 : 912 - 922
  • [5] Cortical inhibition affects habituation to visual evoked potentials: combined effects of light deprivation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects
    Palermo, A.
    Brighina, F.
    Giglia, G.
    Puma, A. R.
    Panettak, M. L.
    Fierro, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 15 : 410 - 410
  • [6] Motor Potentials Evoked by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects
    Saisanen, Laura
    Julkunen, Petro
    Niskanen, Eini
    Danner, Nils
    Hukkanen, Taina
    Lohioja, Tarja
    Nurkkala, Jouka
    Mervaala, Esa
    Karhu, Jari
    Kononen, Mervi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (06) : 367 - 372
  • [7] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) on visual evoked potentials (VEP) of healthy subjects and migraineurs
    Fumal, A.
    Chadaide, Z.
    Schoenen, J.
    Paulus, W.
    Antal, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 : 143 - 143
  • [8] Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials
    Robert Kolbe
    Aykut Aytulun
    Ann-Kristin Müller
    Marius Ringelstein
    Orhan Aktas
    Alfons Schnitzler
    Hans-Peter Hartung
    Stefan Jun Groiss
    Philipp Albrecht
    BMC Neuroscience, 21
  • [9] Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials
    Kolbe, Robert
    Aytulun, Aykut
    Mueller, Ann-Kristin
    Ringelstein, Marius
    Aktas, Orhan
    Schnitzler, Alfons
    Hartung, Hans-Peter
    Groiss, Stefan Jun
    Albrecht, Philipp
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [10] Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in a visual suppression task
    Reichenbach, A.
    Whittingstall, K.
    Thielscher, A.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (02) : 1375 - 1384