Validation and improvement of gamma heating calculation methods for the G.A. Siwabessy multipurpose reactor

被引:0
|
作者
Anis Rohanda
Abdul Waris
Rizal Kurniadi
Syaiful Bakhri
Pardi Pardi
Dwi Haryanto
机构
[1] Bandung Institute of Technology,Department of Physics, Nuclear Physics and Biophysics Research Division, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
[2] Indonesia Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN),Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology and Safety (PTKRN)
[3] Indonesia Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN),Center for Multipurpose Reactor (PRSG)
来源
关键词
Gamma heating; RSG GAS; Calorimeter; NewGamset;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Gamma heating, which is deposited in irradiated targets or samples, is an important issue in research reactors because it affects the safety of samples and the reactor operation. Gamma heating in the Reaktor Serba Guna G.A. Siwabessy (RSG GAS) can be measured or calculated using computer code. In this paper, we present the results obtained by using gamma calorimeters to measure the gamma heating in the central irradiation position in RSG GAS. The measurement results were verified and then compared with the calculation results obtained using the Gamset code. However, the accuracy of the calculation results obtained using Gamset was inadequate, with more than 20% error. Moreover, Gamset was initially created to calculate gamma heating in 35 MWth reactors, and the RSG GAS reactor has an operating power level of 30 MWth. To address these issues, we developed a new program called NewGamset, built with an informative graphical user interface-based display. NewGamset can employ new analytical approaches as it utilizes a calculation base that comprises 18 energy groups and can provide updated physical parameters of RSG GAS. The results of gamma heating measurements obtained using gamma calorimeters made of graphite, aluminum, iron, and zirconium were 2.20 ± 0.03 W/g, 2.25 ± 0.02 W/g, 2.58 ± 0.03 W/g, and 2.91 ± 0.10 W/g, respectively. In general, the calculation results were larger than the measurement results, and the average ratio of calculation to measurement result was 1.37 for Gamset and 1.02 for NewGamset. Hence, it can be concluded that NewGamset provides more accurate results than Gamset. We also report the gamma heating estimation for common elements irradiated in the RSG GAS silicide core, with an operating power level of 15 MWth and 30 MWth. We highly recommend that NewGamset be used for validating the gamma heating data of various target materials in RSG GAS.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Validation and improvement of gamma heating calculation methods for the G.A. Siwabessy multipurpose reactor
    Anis Rohanda
    Abdul Waris
    Rizal Kurniadi
    Syaiful Bakhri
    Pardi Pardi
    Dwi Haryanto
    [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2020, 31 (11) : 70 - 79
  • [2] Validation and improvement of gamma heating calculation methods for the GA Siwabessy multipurpose reactor
    Rohanda, Anis
    Waris, Abdul
    Kurniadi, Rizal
    Bakhri, Syaiful
    Pardi, Pardi
    Haryanto, Dwi
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2020, 31 (11)
  • [3] OPTIMIZATION OF DRY STORAGE FOR SPENT FUEL FROM G.A. SIWABESSY NUCLEAR RESEARCH REACTOR
    Ratiko, R.
    Samudera, S. A.
    Hindami, R.
    Siahaan, A. T.
    Naldi, L.
    Hapsari, D.
    Mahlia, T. M. I.
    Nasruddin, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 9 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [4] CALCULATION OF GAMMA HEATING IN A FAST-REACTOR ENVIRONMENT
    STENSTRO.DG
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1972, 15 (01): : 551 - &
  • [5] Experimental validation of photon-heating calculation for the Jules Horowitz Reactor
    Lemaire, M.
    Vaglio-Gaudard, C.
    Lyoussi, A.
    Reynard-Carette, C.
    Di Salvo, J.
    Gruel, A.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2015, 780 : 68 - 80
  • [6] Verification and validation tests of gamma library of MC2-3 for coupled neutron and gamma heating calculation
    Park, H.
    Jeon, B. K.
    Yang, W. S.
    Smith, M. A.
    Lee, C. H.
    Lell, R. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2020, 146 (146)
  • [7] Qualification of a gamma-ray heating calculation scheme for the future Jules Horowitz material testing reactor (RJH)
    Blanchet, D.
    Huot, N.
    Sireta, P.
    Serviere, H.
    Boyard, M.
    Antony, M.
    Laval, V.
    Henrard, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (04) : 731 - 745
  • [8] Improved gamma-heating calculational methods for fast reactors and their validation for plutonium-burning configurations
    Lüthi, A
    Chawla, R
    Rimpault, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 138 (03) : 233 - 255
  • [9] For a Better Estimation of Gamma Heating in Experimental Reactors and Devices: Stakes and Work Plan from Calculation Methods to Nuclear Data
    Lemaire, Matthieu
    Vaglio-Gaudard, Claire
    Lyoussi, Abdallah
    Reynard-Carette, Christelle
    [J]. 2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION, MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (ANIMMA), 2013,
  • [10] Qualification of a gamma-ray heating calculation scheme for the future Jules Horowitz material testing reactor (RJH) (vol 35, pg 731, 2008)
    Blanchet, D.
    Huot, N.
    Sireta, P.
    Serviere, H.
    Boyard, M.
    Antony, M.
    Laval, V.
    Henrard, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (09) : 1786 - 1786