Erratum to: Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration

被引：0
|
作者：
César Calderón
Alberto Chong
机构：
[1] The World Bank,Latin American and Caribbean Department
[2] Inter-American Development Bank,Research Department
来源：
Public Choice | 2011年 / 147卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：527 / 527
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration
    Calderon, Cesar
    Chong, Alberto
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2009, 138 (1-2) : 65 - 81
  • [2] Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration
    César Calderón
    Alberto Chong
    [J]. Public Choice, 2009, 138 : 65 - 81
  • [3] Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration (vol 138, pg 65, 2009)
    Calderon, Cesar
    Chong, Alberto
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2011, 147 (3-4) : 527 - 527
  • [4] Market institutions and income inequality
    Holcombe, Randall G.
    Boudreaux, Christopher J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 263 - 276
  • [5] THE TRANSITION TO THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, LABOR MARKET INSTITUTIONS, AND INCOME INEQUALITY IN ADVANCED DEMOCRACIES
    Hope, David
    Martelli, Angelo
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 2019, 71 (02) : 236 - 288
  • [6] Labour market institutions and income inequality
    Checchi, Daniele
    Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia
    [J]. ECONOMIC POLICY, 2008, (56) : 603 - 649
  • [7] Labor market institutions and wage inequality
    Koeniger, Winfried
    Leonardi, Marco
    Nunziata, Luca
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2007, 60 (03): : 340 - 356
  • [8] Financialization, labor market institutions and inequality
    Huber, Evelyne
    Petrova, Bilyana
    Stephens, John D.
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 29 (02) : 425 - 452
  • [9] Labor market institutions and earnings inequality
    Freeman, RB
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, : 157 - 168
  • [10] Labor market institutions and earnings inequality - Discussion
    Gottschalk, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, : 169 - 172
12345