The QA Pressure Measurement System: an accuracy and reliability study

被引:0
|
作者
D van Dijk
G Aufdemkampe
S van Langeveld
机构
[1] Center Hospital Apeldoorn,Department of Physical Therapy
[2] Polytechnic of Utrecht,undefined
[3] Rehabilitation Centre `De Hoogstraat',undefined
来源
Spinal Cord | 1999年 / 37卷
关键词
decubitus ulcer; reliability; accuracy; measurement; spinal cord injury;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The main purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of the Queen Alexandra Pressure Measurement System (QA PMS). Furthermore, we examined whether there were significant differences in measured pressures of the buttock area during sitting between normal subjects and spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. Design: Accuracy (calibration) and reliability (test-retest) study. Setting: The spinal cord unit of Tertiary Care Centre `De Hoogstraat' in Utrecht, The Netherlands. Patients: A convenience sample of 16 SCI patients and 15 normal subjects. Main Outcome Measures: The accuracy was determined by using the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM, in mmHg). The Technical Error of Measurement (TEM, in mmHg) was calculated as measure for differences between two paired measurements. The reliability was determined by using an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Significant differences in measured pressures between both groups (P<0.05) were determined by using an unpaired (two sample) t-test. Results: Accuracy (calibration): mean SEM=0.30 (±0.1) mmHg, indicating a high level of accuracy. Differences between two paired measurements: mean TEM calibration=1.87 (±0.76) mmHg; mean TEM normal subjects=4.76 (±1.78) mmHg; mean TEM SCI patients=6.34 (±2.19) mmHg. Reliability: mean ICC(3,1) calibration=0.85 (95% CI=0.74–0.95); mean ICC(2,1) normal subjects=0.92 (95% CI=0.90–0.94); mean ICC(2,1) SCI patients=0.90 (95% CI=0.88–0.92). The normal subjects had significantly higher mean pressures (P=0.028) than the SCI patients (mean pressures 31.0 vs 28.5 mmHg), whilst the SCI patients had significantly higher peak-pressures (P=0.0000) than the normal subjects (mean peak-pressures: 134.1 vs 75.7 mmHg). Conclusions: The QA Pressure Measurement System has sufficient accuracy and good reliability as a measurement procedure. There are significant differences between the measured pressures of both groups: the significantly higher peak pressures of the SCI patients seem to be the most important.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The QA Pressure Measurement System: an accuracy and reliability study
    van Dijk, D
    Aufdemkampe, G
    van Langeveld, S
    SPINAL CORD, 1999, 37 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [2] Spatial Accuracy QA of An MR System
    Hwang, K.
    Illerstam, F.
    Torfeh, T.
    Maier, J.
    Shave, S.
    Hoang, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 189 - 190
  • [3] Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint
    Wilson, DR
    Apreleva, MV
    Eichler, MJ
    Harrold, FR
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (12) : 1909 - 1915
  • [4] A Study for the Limitation of Measurement Accuracy and Reliability of Autostigmatic Null lens System by Adjustment and Fixing Process
    Lee, Young Hun
    Rim, Choen Seog
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF OPTICS AND PHOTONICS, 2005, 16 (05) : 440 - 445
  • [5] Monitoring system of accuracy and reliability of the temperature measurement in the WWER-440
    Shtants, S.
    Repa, M.
    Atomnaya Energiya, 2002, 93 (02): : 97 - 101
  • [6] Accuracy and reliability of tridimensional electromagnetic sensor system for elbow ROM measurement
    Yamaura, Kohei
    Mifune, Yutaka
    Inui, Atsuyuki
    Nishimoto, Hanako
    Kataoka, Takeshi
    Kurosawa, Takashi
    Mukohara, Shintaro
    Hoshino, Yuichi
    Niikura, Takahiro
    Nagamune, Kouki
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of New Shooting Accuracy Measurement System (SAMS) Software
    Fidan, U.
    Yildiz, M.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2016, 87 : S66 - S66
  • [8] Accuracy and reliability of tridimensional electromagnetic sensor system for elbow ROM measurement
    Kohei Yamaura
    Yutaka Mifune
    Atsuyuki Inui
    Hanako Nishimoto
    Takeshi Kataoka
    Takashi Kurosawa
    Shintaro Mukohara
    Yuichi Hoshino
    Takahiro Niikura
    Kouki Nagamune
    Ryosuke Kuroda
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [10] STUDY OF THE RELIABILITY OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY PATIENTS
    SCHOBEL, H
    BACHMANN, K
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1986, 75 : 79 - 79