Beyond the hype: deep neural networks outperform established methods using a ChEMBL bioactivity benchmark set

被引:0
|
作者
Eelke B. Lenselink
Niels ten Dijke
Brandon Bongers
George Papadatos
Herman W. T. van Vlijmen
Wojtek Kowalczyk
Adriaan P. IJzerman
Gerard J. P. van Westen
机构
[1] Leiden University,Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research
[2] Leiden University,Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science
[3] European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI),European Molecular Biology Laboratory
[4] GlaxoSmithKline,undefined
[5] Medicines Research Centre,undefined
关键词
Deep neural networks; ChEMBL; QSAR; Proteochemometrics; Chemogenomics; Cheminformatics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increase of publicly available bioactivity data in recent years has fueled and catalyzed research in chemogenomics, data mining, and modeling approaches. As a direct result, over the past few years a multitude of different methods have been reported and evaluated, such as target fishing, nearest neighbor similarity-based methods, and Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR)-based protocols. However, such studies are typically conducted on different datasets, using different validation strategies, and different metrics. In this study, different methods were compared using one single standardized dataset obtained from ChEMBL, which is made available to the public, using standardized metrics (BEDROC and Matthews Correlation Coefficient). Specifically, the performance of Naïve Bayes, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, and Deep Neural Networks was assessed using QSAR and proteochemometric (PCM) methods. All methods were validated using both a random split validation and a temporal validation, with the latter being a more realistic benchmark of expected prospective execution. Deep Neural Networks are the top performing classifiers, highlighting the added value of Deep Neural Networks over other more conventional methods. Moreover, the best method (‘DNN_PCM’) performed significantly better at almost one standard deviation higher than the mean performance. Furthermore, Multi-task and PCM implementations were shown to improve performance over single task Deep Neural Networks. Conversely, target prediction performed almost two standard deviations under the mean performance. Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression performed around mean performance. Finally, using an ensemble of DNNs, alongside additional tuning, enhanced the relative performance by another 27% (compared with unoptimized ‘DNN_PCM’). Here, a standardized set to test and evaluate different machine learning algorithms in the context of multi-task learning is offered by providing the data and the protocols.Graphical Abstract.[graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beyond the hype: deep neural networks outperform established methods using a ChEMBL bioactivity benchmark set
    Lenselink, Eelke B.
    ten Dijke, Niels
    Bongers, Brandon
    Papadatos, George
    van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
    Kowalczyk, Wojtek
    IJzerman, Adriaan P.
    van Westen, Gerard J. P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2017, 9
  • [2] A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks
    Hooker, Sara
    Erhan, Dumitru
    Kindermans, Pieter-Jan
    Kim, Been
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [3] Using Deep Neural Networks for Inverse Problems in Imaging Beyond analytical methods
    Lucas, Alice
    Iliadis, Michael
    Molina, Rafael
    Katsaggelos, Aggelos K.
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2018, 35 (01) : 20 - 36
  • [4] Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications
    Samek, Wojciech
    Montavon, Gregoire
    Lapuschkin, Sebastian
    Anders, Christopher J.
    Mueller, Klaus-Robert
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2021, 109 (03) : 247 - 278
  • [5] Deep Tracking: Seeing Beyond Seeing Using Recurrent Neural Networks
    Ondruska, Peter
    Posner, Ingmar
    THIRTIETH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, : 3361 - 3367
  • [6] Feature set evaluation and robust neural networks using Boundary Methods
    Sancho, JL
    Pierson, WE
    Ulug, B
    Ahalt, SC
    Figueiras-Vidal, AR
    WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: ISAS '98, 1998, : 630 - 637
  • [7] On the Impact of Data Set Size in Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Networks
    Soekhoe, Deepak
    van der Putten, Peter
    Plaat, Aske
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS XV, 2016, 9897 : 50 - 60
  • [8] Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Visual Detection and Tracking using Deep Neural Networks: A Performance Benchmark
    Isaac-Medina, Brian K. S.
    Poyser, Matt
    Organisciak, Daniel
    Willcocks, Chris G.
    Breckon, Toby P.
    Shum, Hubert P. H.
    2021 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION WORKSHOPS (ICCVW 2021), 2021, : 1223 - 1232
  • [9] Initial Research on Fruit Classification Methods Using Deep Neural Networks
    Nasarzewski, Zbigniew
    Garbat, Piotr
    IMAGE PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS: TECHNIQUES, ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 1062 : 108 - 113
  • [10] Deep-learning: investigating deep neural networks hyper-parameters and comparison of performance to shallow methods for modeling bioactivity data
    Koutsoukas, Alexios
    Monaghan, Keith J.
    Li, Xiaoli
    Huan, Jun
    JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2017, 9