Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology

被引：0
|
作者：
Paul Russell Roberts
Ashesh B. Jani
Satyaseelan Packianathan
Ashley Albert
Rahul Bhandari
Srinivasan Vijayakumar
机构：
[1] University of Mississippi Medical Center,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University,Department of Radiation Oncology
来源：
Radiation Oncology | / 13卷
关键词：
Radiation therapy; Treatment planning; Treatment response; Imaging;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
For 2018, the American Cancer Society estimated that there would be approximately 1.7 million new diagnoses of cancer and about 609,640 cancer-related deaths in the United States. By 2030 these numbers are anticipated to exceed a staggering 21 million annual diagnoses and 13 million cancer-related deaths. The three primary therapeutic modalities for cancer treatments are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Individually or in combination, these treatment modalities have provided and continue to provide curative and palliative care to the myriad victims of cancer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology
    Roberts, Paul Russell
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Packianathan, Satyaseelan
    Albert, Ashley
    Bhandari, Rahul
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [2] PET-CT in radiation oncology - The impact on diagnosis, treatment planning, and assessment of treatment response
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Andrade, Regiane S.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Smith, Ryan P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 31 (04): : 352 - 362
  • [3] Modern Treatment Concepts in Radiation Oncology
    Plasswilm, Ludwig
    Studer, Gabriela
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Zwahlen, Daniel R.
    [J]. THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU, 2019, 76 (04) : 209 - 218
  • [4] Image guidance in radiation oncology treatment planning: The role of imaging technologies on the planning process
    Mah, Dennis
    Chen, Chin Cheng
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (02) : 114 - 118
  • [5] Imaging of response to treatment in oncology
    Fournier, L. S.
    Cuenod, C. A.
    Clement, O.
    Siauve, N.
    Frija, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (06): : 829 - 843
  • [6] Imaging for Target Delineation and Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology Current and Emerging Techniques
    Stieb, Sonja
    McDonald, Brigid
    Gronberg, Mary
    Engeseth, Grete May
    He, Renjie
    Fuller, Clifton David
    [J]. HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 33 (06) : 963 - +
  • [7] Analysis of Treatment Planning Progress in Radiation Oncology
    Stathakis, S.
    Kabat, C.
    McConnell, K.
    Ha, C.
    Rasmussen, K.
    Kirby, N.
    Saenz, D.
    Baacke, D.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [8] THE IMAGING REVOLUTION AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY - USE OF CT, ULTRASOUND, AND NMR FOR LOCALIZATION, TREATMENT PLANNING AND TREATMENT DELIVERY
    GLATSTEIN, E
    LICHTER, AS
    FRAASS, BA
    KELLY, BA
    VANDEGEIJN, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (02): : 299 - 314
  • [9] Imaging in the evaluation of response to treatment in oncology
    Bisi, Gianni
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 62 (02): : 127 - 128
  • [10] FDG-PET in radiation treatment planning: Radiation oncology
    De Ruysscher, D.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S177 - S177
12345