Use of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:23
|
作者
Tricco A.C. [1 ]
Soobiah C. [1 ]
Lillie E. [1 ]
Perrier L. [1 ]
Chen M.H. [1 ]
Hemmelgarn B. [2 ]
Majumdar S.R. [3 ,4 ]
Straus S.E. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Toronto
[2] Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
[3] Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton
[4] Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Mild Cognitive Impairment; Memantine; Rivastigmine; Galantamine; Mild Cognitive Impairment Patient;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-1-25
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Elderly individuals who have memory problems without significant limitations in activities of daily living are often diagnosed as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Some of these individuals progress to dementia. Several cognitive enhancers (for example donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, memantine) have been approved for use in people with Alzheimer's dementia but their use in patients with MCI is unclear. We aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers for MCI through a systematic review and network (that is, indirect comparisons) meta-analysis.Design/Methods: We will include studies that examine the use of cognitive enhancers compared to placebo, supportive care, or other cognitive enhancers among patients diagnosed with MCI. Outcomes of interest include cognition and function (primary outcomes), as well as behavior, quality of life, safety, and cost (secondary outcomes). We will include all experimental studies (randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials), quasi-experimental studies (controlled before-after, interrupted time series), and observational studies (cohort, case-control). Studies will be included regardless of publication status (that is, we will include unpublished studies), year, or language of dissemination.To identify potentially relevant material, we will search the following electronic databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Ageline. The electronic database search will be supplemented by scanning the reference lists of included studies, searching Google and organization websites for unpublished or difficult to locate material literature, and contacting experts.Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for inclusion using the eligibility criteria established a priori and independently extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for experimental and quasi-experimental studies and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational epidemiology studies. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis are planned, if the studies are deemed statistically, methodologically, and clinically homogenous.Discussion: Our systematic review will provide important information regarding the benefits, costs, and harms of cognitive enhancers for patients with MCI. This information can be used to assist healthcare providers, policy-makers, MCI patients and their family regarding the use of these agents.PROSPERO registry number: CRD42012002234. © 2012 Tricco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Berliner, Shirra
    Ho, Joanne M.
    Ng, Carmen H.
    Ashoor, Huda M.
    Chen, Maggie H.
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 185 (16) : 1393 - 1401
  • [2] Traditional Chinese medicine for mild cognitive impairment A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wang, Haiyan
    Yu, Haiyang
    Song, Kai
    Xiong, Fanjie
    Zhang, Hong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (37)
  • [3] Cognitive interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandler, M. J.
    Parks, A. C.
    Marsiske, M.
    Rotblatt, L. J.
    Smith, G. E.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (04) : 709 - 709
  • [4] Effects of moxibustion on symptoms of mild cognitive impairment: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Lin-Peng
    Wang, Gui-Ling
    Sun, Jing-Qing
    Mao, Xue-Wen
    Jiang, Hui-Li
    Li, Bin
    Liu, Cun-Zhi
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [5] Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's disease: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Tricco A.C.
    vanderVaart S.
    Soobiah C.
    Lillie E.
    Perrier L.
    Chen M.H.
    Hemmelgarn B.
    Majumdar S.R.
    Straus S.E.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 1 (1)
  • [6] Comparative efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for treating vascular cognitive impairment: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Bo-Ru Jin
    Hua-Yan Liu
    [J]. Neural Regeneration Research, 2019, 14 (05) : 805 - 816
  • [7] Comparative efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for treating vascular cognitive impairment: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Jin, Bo-Ru
    Liu, Hua-Yan
    [J]. NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (05) : 805 - 816
  • [8] Use of statins and the risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Che-Sheng Chu
    Ping-Tao Tseng
    Brendon Stubbs
    Tien-Yu Chen
    Chia-Hung Tang
    Dian-Jeng Li
    Wei-Cheng Yang
    Yen-Wen Chen
    Ching-Kuan Wu
    Nicola Veronese
    Andre F. Carvalho
    Brisa S. Fernandes
    Nathan Herrmann
    Pao-Yen Lin
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [9] Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chandler, M. J.
    Parks, A. C.
    Marsiske, M.
    Rotblatt, L. J.
    Smith, G. E.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 26 (03) : 225 - 251
  • [10] Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    M. J. Chandler
    A. C. Parks
    M. Marsiske
    L. J. Rotblatt
    G. E. Smith
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2016, 26 : 225 - 251