Update of likelihood-based ground-motion model selection for seismic hazard analysis in western central Europe

被引:0
|
作者
Esther Hintersberger
Frank Scherbaum
Sebastian Hainzl
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Institute of Geosciences
来源
关键词
Ground-motion selection; Low-seismicity region; Stochastic model; Western central Europe;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scherbaum et al. [(2004) Bull Seismolo Soc Am 94(6): 2164–2185] proposed a likelihood-based approach to select and rank ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in regions of low-seismicity. The results of their analysis were first used within the PEGASOS project [Abrahamson et al. (2002), In Proceedings of the 12 ECEE, London, 2002, Paper no. 633] so far the only application of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) in Europe which was based on a SSHAC Level 4 procedure [(Budnitz et al. 1997, Recommendations for PSHA: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. No. NUREG/CR-6372-V1). The outcome of this project have generated considerable discussion (Klügel 2005, Eng Geol 78:285–307, 2005b) Eng Geol 78: 285–307, (2005c) Eng Geol 82: 79–85 Musson et al. (2005) Eng Geol 82(1): 43–55]; Budnitz et al. (2005), Eng Geol 78(3–4): 285–307], a central part of which is related to the issue of ground-motion model selection and ranking. Since at the time of the study by Scherbaum et al. [(2004.) Bull Seismolo Soc Am 94(6): 2164–2185], only records from one earthquake were available for the study area, here we test the stability of their results using more recent data. Increasing the data set from 12 records of one earthquake in Scherbaum et al. [(2004) Bull Seismolo Soc Am 94(6): 2164–2185] to 61 records of 5 earthquakes, which have mainly occurred since the publication of the original study, does not change the set of the three top-ranked ground-motion models [Abrahamson and Silva (1997) Seismolo Res Latt 68(1): 94–127; Lussou et al. (2001) J Earthquake Eng 5(1):13–33; Berge-Thierry et al. (2003) Bull Seismolog Soc Am 95(2): 377–389. Only for the lower-ranked models do we obtain modifications in the ranking order. Furthermore, the records from the Waldkirch earthquake (Dec, 5th, 2004, Mw =  4.9) enabled us to develop a new stochastic model parameter set for the application of Campbell’s [(2003) Bull Seismolo Soc Am 93(3): 1012–1033] hybrid empirical model to SW Germany and neighbouring regions.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Update of likelihood-based ground-motion model selection for seismic hazard analysis in western central Europe
    Hintersberger, Esther
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Hainzl, Sebastian
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 5 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [2] On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Douglas, John
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Bungum, Hilmar
    Faeh, Donat
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) : 783 - 793
  • [3] On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analysis
    Arroyo, Danny
    Ordaz, Mario
    Rueda, Raul
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 104 (04) : 1860 - 1875
  • [4] On the Forecasting of Ground-Motion Parameters for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
    不详
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2011, 27 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [5] Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe
    Delavaud, Elise
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Akkar, Sinan
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Danciu, Laurentiu
    Beauval, Celine
    Drouet, Stephane
    Douglas, John
    Basili, Roberto
    Sandikkaya, M. Abdullah
    Segou, Margaret
    Faccioli, Ezio
    Theodoulidis, Nikos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 451 - 473
  • [6] Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe
    Elise Delavaud
    Fabrice Cotton
    Sinan Akkar
    Frank Scherbaum
    Laurentiu Danciu
    Céline Beauval
    Stéphane Drouet
    John Douglas
    Roberto Basili
    M. Abdullah Sandikkaya
    Margaret Segou
    Ezio Faccioli
    Nikos Theodoulidis
    [J]. Journal of Seismology, 2012, 16 : 451 - 473
  • [7] Ranking of several ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in Iran
    Ghasemi, H.
    Zare, M.
    Fukushima, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [8] The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground motion models in the western US
    Powers, Peter M.
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Luco, Nicolas
    Boyd, Oliver S.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Frankel, Arthur D.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (04) : 2315 - 2341
  • [9] The Ground-Motion Characterization Model for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Bora, Sanjay S.
    Lee, Robin L.
    Manea, Elena F.
    Gerstenberger, Matthew C.
    Stafford, Peter J.
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    Weatherill, Graeme
    Hutchinson, Jesse
    de la Torre, Christopher A.
    Hulsey, Anne M.
    Kaiser, Anna E.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (01) : 329 - 349
  • [10] The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Subduction ground-motion models
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Powers, Peter M.
    Altekruse, Jason
    Ahdi, Sean K.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Frankel, Arthur D.
    Wirth, Erin A.
    Smith, James A.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Withers, Kyle B.
    Herrick, Julie A.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (03) : 1739 - 1786