Comparative study of single and multi-layered packed-bed thermal energy storage systems for CSP plants

被引:10
|
作者
Abdulla A. [1 ]
Reddy K.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai
关键词
D O I
10.3103/S0003701X17030021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Multi-layered Thermal Energy Storage (TES) tank consists of three regions–top and bottom part is packed with suitable Phase Change Materials (PCM) and low-cost pebbles are placed in the middle region, whereas entire tank portion is filled by solid fillers in Single-layered tank system. For a storage tank operating between 563 and 663 K with bed dimensions of 12 and 14.38 m using Solar salt as Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF), it is observed that the duration of discharge for multi-layered tank is 5.32 h whereas it is 4.19 h for single-layered tank with a Reynolds number of 10. The effect of intermediate melting temperature range of PCMs are also analyzed by taking PCMs with sharp as well as intermediate melting ranges. Further, comparison of single and multi-layered systems is carried out by analyzing the temperature profiles and width of both PCM layers. The width of top and bottom PCM layers of tank is varied from 0 to 30% to analyze its effect on the discharging duration. It is observed that multi-layered system provides extra discharge of 1 h with introduction of PCM at top and bottom with a width of 10%. Discharge duration increases with increase in PCM width whereas the percentage increase in duration of discharge with increase in PCM width is comparatively less. It is also seen that PCMs with sharp melting point performs better compared to one having intermediate range of melting temperatures. Multi-layered configuration concept offers best possibilities as integration to CSP plants with desired efficiency. © 2017, Allerton Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 286
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computational study of performance of cascaded multi-layered packed-bed thermal energy storage for high temperature applications
    Majumdar, Rudrodip
    Saha, Sandip K.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 32
  • [2] Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems
    Rabi, Ayah Marwan
    Radulovic, Jovana
    Buick, James M.
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (05)
  • [3] A systematic assessment on a solar collector integrated packed-bed single/multi-layered latent heat thermal energy storage system
    Alptekin, Ersin
    Ezan, Mehmet Akif
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 37
  • [4] A systematic assessment on a solar collector integrated packed-bed single/multi-layered latent heat thermal energy storage system
    Alptekin, Ersin
    Ezan, Mehmet Akif
    Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 37
  • [5] PACKED-BED THERMAL STORAGE-SYSTEMS
    SANDERSON, TM
    CUNNINGHAM, GT
    APPLIED ENERGY, 1995, 51 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [6] A COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURED AND PACKED-BED THERMOCLINE THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS
    Strasser, Matthew N.
    Selvam, R. Panneer
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER HEAT TRANSFER CONFERENCE - 2013, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [7] Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization of Thermocline Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems
    Marti, Jan
    Geissbuehler, Lukas
    Becattini, Viola
    Haselbacher, Andreas
    Steinfeld, Aldo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ISES EUROSUN 2016 CONFERENCE, 2017, : 554 - 565
  • [8] Cyclic thermal performance analysis of a traditional Single-Layered and of a novel Multi-Layered Packed-Bed molten salt Thermocline Tank
    Li, Meng-Jie
    Qiu, Yu
    Li, Ming-Jia
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 118 : 565 - 578
  • [9] Experimental study and analysis of a novel layered packed-bed for thermal energy storage applications: A proof of concept
    Ameen, Muhammad Tahir
    Ma, Zhiwei
    Smallbone, Andrew
    Norman, Rosemary
    Roskilly, Anthony Paul
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 277
  • [10] TRANSIENT ANALYSIS OF PACKED-BED THERMAL STORAGE SYSTEMS
    RIAZ, M
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1978, 21 (02) : 123 - 128