Individual Differences in Serial Dependence of Facial Identity are Associated with Face Recognition Abilities

被引:0
|
作者
Kaitlyn Turbett
Romina Palermo
Jason Bell
Jessamy Burton
Linda Jeffery
机构
[1] School of Psychological Science,
[2] University of Western Australia,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Serial dependence is a perceptual bias where current perception is biased towards prior visual input. This bias occurs when perceiving visual attributes, such as facial identity, and has been argued to play an important functional role in vision, stabilising the perception of objects through integration. In face identity recognition, this bias could assist in building stable representations of facial identity. If so, then individual variation in serial dependence could contribute to face recognition ability. To investigate this possibility, we measured both the strength of serial dependence and the range over which individuals showed this bias (the tuning) in 219 adults, using a new measure of serial dependence of facial identity. We found that better face recognition was associated with stronger serial dependence and narrower tuning, that is, showing serial dependence primarily when sequential faces were highly similar. Serial dependence tuning was further found to be a significant predictor of face recognition abilities independently of both object recognition and face identity aftereffects. These findings suggest that the extent to which serial dependence is used selectively for similar faces is important to face recognition. Our results are consistent with the view that serial dependence plays a functional role in face recognition.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual Differences in Serial Dependence of Facial Identity are Associated with Face Recognition Abilities
    Turbett, Kaitlyn
    Palermo, Romina
    Bell, Jason
    Burton, Jessamy
    Jeffery, Linda
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [2] Individual Differences in Adaptive Coding of Face Identity Are Linked to Individual Differences in Face Recognition Ability
    Rhodes, Gillian
    Jeffery, Linda
    Taylor, Libby
    Hayward, William G.
    Ewing, Louise
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (03) : 897 - 903
  • [3] Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults
    Boutet, Isabelle
    Meinhardt-Injac, Bozana
    COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [4] Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults
    Isabelle Boutet
    Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
    Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6
  • [5] Individual Differences in Brain Responses to Dynamic Facial Expressions and their Relationship to Face Cognition Abilities
    Recio, G.
    Hildebrandt, A.
    Sommer, W.
    Wilhelm, O.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 101 : 509 - 509
  • [6] Face familiarity promotes stable identity recognition: exploring face perception using serial dependence
    Kok, Rebecca
    Taubert, Jessica
    Van der Burg, Erik
    Rhodes, Gillian
    Alais, David
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (03):
  • [7] Fusiform Gyrus Face Selectivity Relates to Individual Differences in Facial Recognition Ability
    Furl, Nicholas
    Garrido, Lucia
    Dolan, Raymond J.
    Driver, Jon
    Duchaine, Bradley
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (07) : 1723 - 1740
  • [8] Individual Differences in the Ability to Recognise Facial Identity Are Associated with Social Anxiety
    Davis, Joshua M.
    McKone, Elinor
    Dennett, Hugh
    O'Connor, Kirsty B.
    O'Kearney, Richard
    Palermo, Romina
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [9] Individual differences in face identity processing
    McCaffery, Jennifer M.
    Robertson, David J.
    Young, Andrew W.
    Burton, A. Mike
    COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018, 3
  • [10] Individual differences in face identity processing
    Jennifer M. McCaffery
    David J. Robertson
    Andrew W. Young
    A. Mike Burton
    Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3