Flexibility in cash-flow classification under IFRS: determinants and consequences

被引:0
|
作者
Elizabeth A. Gordon
Elaine Henry
Bjorn N. Jorgensen
Cheryl L. Linthicum
机构
[1] Temple University,Fox School of Business and Management
[2] Stevens Institute of Technology,School of Business
[3] London School of Economics and Political Science,College of Business
[4] University of Texas at San Antonio,undefined
来源
关键词
Statement of cash flows; Classification shifting; IFRS; Operating cash flows; M41;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) allow managers flexibility in classifying interest paid, interest received, and dividends received within operating, investing, or financing activities within the statement of cash flows. In contrast, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires these items to be classified as operating cash flows (OCF). Studying IFRS-reporting firms in 13 European countries, we document firms’ cash-flow classification choices vary, with about 76, 60, and 57% of our sample classifying interest paid, interest received, and dividends received, respectively, in OCF. Reported OCF under IFRS tends to exceed what would be reported under U.S. GAAP. We find the main determinants of OCF-enhancing classification choices are capital market incentives and other firm characteristics, including greater likelihood of financial distress, higher leverage, and accessing equity markets more frequently. In analyzing the consequences of reporting flexibility, we find some evidence that the market’s assessment of the persistence of operating cash flows and accruals varies with the firm’s classification choices and the results of certain OCF prediction models are sensitive to classification choices.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 872
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexibility in cash-flow classification under IFRS: determinants and consequences
    Gordon, Elizabeth A.
    Henry, Elaine
    Jorgensen, Bjorn N.
    Linthicum, Cheryl L.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2017, 22 (02) : 839 - 872
  • [2] Classification of Equity Instruments under IFRS 9: Determinants and Consequences
    Pinto, Ines
    Morais, Ana Isabel
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 32 (04) : 411 - 426
  • [3] CASH-FLOW GAP
    CATCHPOL.WM
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1968, (84): : 8 - &
  • [4] THE CASH-FLOW ILLUSION
    PATON, WA
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1963, 38 (02): : 243 - 251
  • [5] CASH-FLOW TAX
    SHOME, P
    SCHUTTE, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND STAFF PAPERS, 1993, 40 (03): : 638 - 662
  • [6] Cash-Flow Sensitivities and the Allocation of Internal Cash Flow
    Chang, Xin
    Dasgupta, Sudipto
    Wong, George
    Yao, Jiaquan
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 27 (12): : 3628 - 3657
  • [7] FIND THE CASH-FLOW WINNERS
    HERSHMAN, A
    [J]. DUNS BUSINESS MONTH, 1982, 120 (02): : 89 - &
  • [8] A CASH-FLOW CONCEPT OF PROFIT
    BODENHORN, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1964, 19 (01): : 16 - 31
  • [9] CASH-FLOW TRANCHING AND THE MACROECONOMY
    Amaral, Pedro S.
    Quintin, Erwan
    Corbae, Dean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 61 (04) : 1815 - 1843
  • [10] STRATEGIES IN CASH-FLOW MANAGEMENT
    CHASTAIN, CE
    CIANCIOLO, STA
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 1986, 29 (03) : 65 - 73