Unconscionability of E-contracts: A Comparative Study of India, the United Kingdom, and the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Dharmita Prasad
Pallavi Mishra
机构
[1] O.P. Jindal Global University,
[2] Symbiosis International (Deemed) University,undefined
来源
Liverpool Law Review | 2022年 / 43卷
关键词
Electronic contracts; Consumer contracts; Duty to read; Adhesion; Unconscionability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adhesion contracts have a strong likelihood of being unconscionable. The laws and principles are further complicated by the introduction of electronic contracts, specifically electronic consumer contracts. The paper touches upon the duty to read doctrine in contracts and electronic contracts. While the doctrine of unconscionability has evolved it has been playing catch up with the demands of consumers. This paper compares the application of this doctrine in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and India. The paper also proposes recommendations for consumers and the development of laws.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 360
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条