A short step between democracy and dictatorship

被引:0
|
作者
Antonio Quesada
机构
[1] Universitat Rovira i Virgili,Departament d’Economia
来源
Theory and Decision | 2012年 / 72卷
关键词
Social welfare function; Majority; Unanimity; Dictatorship; Axiomatic characterization; Two alternatives; D71;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When preferences are defined over two alternatives and societies are variable, the group formed by the relative majority rule, the unanimity rule, the dictatorial rules, and the strongly dictatorial rules is characterized in terms of five axioms: unanimity, reducibility, substitutability, exchangeability, and parity. This result is used to provide characterizations of each of these rules by postulating separating axioms, that is, an axiom and its negation. Such axioms identify traits specifically differentiating a type of rule from the other types. For instance, majority differs from strong dictatorship in the existence of a society for which collective indifference should be a less likely outcome than the strict preference of one alternative over the other. As a second example, the difference between majority and strong dictatorship can be traced back to the requirement that the likelihood of collective indifference diminishes with the size of society.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 166
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条