Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lisa Weik
Leonard Fehring
Achim Mortsiefer
Sven Meister
机构
[1] Witten/Herdecke University,Health Care Informatics, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine
[2] Helios University Hospital Wuppertal,Faculty of Health, School of Medicine
[3] Department of Gastroenterology,General Practice II and Patient
[4] Witten/Herdecke University,Centredness in Primary Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine
[5] Witten/Herdecke University,Department Healthcare
[6] Witten/Herdecke University,undefined
[7] Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISST,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Extensive research has shown the potential value of digital health solutions and highlighted the importance of clinicians’ adoption. As general practitioners (GPs) are patients’ first point of contact, understanding influencing factors to their digital health adoption is especially important to derive personalized practical recommendations. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study broadly identifies adoption barriers and potential improvement strategies in general practices, including the impact of GPs’ inherent characteristics – especially their personality – on digital health adoption. Results of our online survey with 216 GPs reveal moderate overall barriers on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with required workflow adjustments (M = 4.13, SD = 0.93), inadequate reimbursement (M = 4.02, SD = 1.02), and high training effort (M = 3.87, SD = 1.01) as substantial barriers. Improvement strategies are considered important overall, with respondents especially wishing for improved interoperability (M = 4.38, SD = 0.81), continued technical support (M = 4.33, SD = 0.91), and improved usability (M = 4.20, SD = 0.88). In our regression model, practice-related characteristics, the expected future digital health usage, GPs’ digital affinity, several personality traits, and digital maturity are significant predictors of the perceived strength of barriers. For the perceived importance of improvement strategies, only demographics and usage-related variables are significant predictors. This study provides strong evidence for the impact of GPs’ inherent characteristics on barriers and improvement strategies. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive approaches integrating personal and emotional elements to make digitization in practices more engaging, tangible, and applicable.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis
    Weik, Lisa
    Fehring, Leonard
    Mortsiefer, Achim
    Meister, Sven
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [2] Analysis of adoption of conservation agriculture practices in southern Africa: mixed-methods approach
    Tufa, Adane H.
    Kanyamuka, Joseph S.
    Alene, Arega
    Ngoma, Hambulo
    Marenya, Paswel P.
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Banda, Happy
    Chikoye, David
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [3] Identifying and understanding digital exclusion: a mixed-methods study
    Wilson-Menzfeld, G.
    Erfani, G.
    Young-Murphy, L.
    Charlton, W.
    De Luca, H.
    Brittain, K.
    Steven, A.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Understanding the Connections Between Dogs, Health and Inuit Through a Mixed-Methods Study
    Aenishaenslin, Cecile
    Brunet, Patricia
    Levesque, Francis
    Gouin, Geraldine G.
    Simon, Audrey
    Saint-Charles, Johanne
    Leighton, Patrick
    Bastian, Suzanne
    Ravel, Andre
    [J]. ECOHEALTH, 2019, 16 (01) : 151 - 160
  • [5] Understanding the Connections Between Dogs, Health and Inuit Through a Mixed-Methods Study
    Cécile Aenishaenslin
    Patricia Brunet
    Francis Lévesque
    Géraldine G. Gouin
    Audrey Simon
    Johanne Saint-Charles
    Patrick Leighton
    Suzanne Bastian
    André Ravel
    [J]. EcoHealth, 2019, 16 : 151 - 160
  • [6] Digital Technologies Adoption and Economic Benefits in Agriculture: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Geng, Wenxuan
    Liu, Liping
    Zhao, Junye
    Kang, Xiaoru
    Wang, Wenliang
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [7] Factors driving differences in the adoption of quality management practices among hospitals: A two-phase, sequential mixed-methods analysis
    Hoogestraat, Fenja
    Wild, Eva-Maria
    Winter, Vera
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 49 (03) : 161 - 175
  • [8] Factors Influencing Southeastern US Mothers' Participation in Baby-Friendly Practices: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Munn, Allison C.
    Newman, Susan D.
    Phillips, Shannon M.
    Mueller, Martina
    Taylor, Sarah N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2018, 34 (04) : 821 - 834
  • [9] Understanding homelessness, mental health and substance abuse through a mixed-methods longitudinal approach
    Rayburn, Rachel L.
    [J]. HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 22 (04): : 389 - 399
  • [10] Exploring the values of writing collaboratively through a digital storytelling platform: a mixed-methods analysis of users' participation, perspectives and practices
    Rubino, Irene
    Barberis, Claudia
    Malnati, Giovanni
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 26 (07) : 882 - 894