On the Effect of Synthetic and Real Data Properties on Seismic Intensity Prediction Equations

被引:0
|
作者
Roman N. Vakarchuk
Päivi Mäntyniemi
Ruben E. Tatevossian
机构
[1] Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Physics of the Earth
[2] University of Helsinki,Department of Geosciences and Geography, Institute of Seismology
来源
关键词
Macroseismology; Intensity data point; Seismic intensity prediction equation; United Kingdom;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present investigation focuses on the effect of input data properties on the estimation of seismic intensity prediction equation (IPE) coefficients. Emphasis is placed on small-to-moderate magnitude earthquakes. Synthetic intensity data points (IDPs) are created using a given IPE, assuming independence of azimuth. Extensive simulations are performed for single earthquakes and a synthetic database. Tests of single earthquakes show that increasing the sample size narrows the range of obtained coefficients. The larger the difference between the shortest and longest distance of IDPs from the epicentre, the narrower is this range. A short radius of perceptibility is more rapidly saturated with new data points than a long one. The synthetic database is used to examine the effect of magnitude and depth errors. The performance of synthetic data gives a model with which the real data can be compared. The attenuation coefficient appears stable against magnitude errors of ± 0.2 units, but starts to be overestimated as magnitude errors increase. Assuming an erroneous regional depth easily leads to intensity differences of 1 degree. The mean coefficient values deviate from the correct ones and tend to increase with depth. The results resemble the synthetic ones, but imply larger uncertainties. The attenuation coefficient, ν, appears to be the least sensitive coefficient to errors. Real data from seven post-1965 earthquakes in the magnitude range of 4.0–5.2 were retrieved from the intensity database of the United Kingdom.
引用
收藏
页码:4261 / 4275
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Effect of Synthetic and Real Data Properties on Seismic Intensity Prediction Equations
    Vakarchuk, Roman N.
    Mantyniemi, Paivi
    Tatevossian, Ruben E.
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 176 (10) : 4261 - 4275
  • [2] Reference soil condition for intensity prediction equations derived from seismological and geophysical data at seismic stations
    Francesco Panzera
    Paolo Bergamo
    Donat Fäh
    Journal of Seismology, 2021, 25 : 163 - 179
  • [3] Reference soil condition for intensity prediction equations derived from seismological and geophysical data at seismic stations
    Panzera, Francesco
    Bergamo, Paolo
    Faeh, Donat
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2021, 25 (01) : 163 - 179
  • [4] Macroseismic intensity prediction equations for Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source
    Radu Văcăreanu
    Mihail Iancovici
    Cristian Neagu
    Florin Pavel
    Natural Hazards, 2015, 79 : 2005 - 2031
  • [5] Macroseismic intensity prediction equations for Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source
    Vacareanu, Radu
    Iancovici, Mihail
    Neagu, Cristian
    Pavel, Florin
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (03) : 2005 - 2031
  • [6] A Real-Time Seismic Intensity Prediction Framework Based on Interpretable Ensemble Learning
    Hu, Jinjun
    Ding, Yitian
    Zhang, Hui
    Jin, Chaoyue
    Wang, Zhongwei
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 94 (03) : 1579 - 1602
  • [8] INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC INTENSITY DATA
    EVERNDEN, JF
    HIBBARD, RR
    SCHNEIDER, JF
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1973, 63 (02) : 399 - +
  • [9] Intensity Prediction Equations Based on the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI-07) Scale: Application to Normal Fault Earthquakes
    Pizza, Marco
    Ferrario, Francesca
    Michetti, Alessandro M.
    Velazquez-Bucio, M. Magdalena
    Lacan, Pierre
    Porfido, Sabina
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (17):
  • [10] Learning stable seismic wave equations for porous media from real data
    Xiong, Fansheng
    Yong, Wen-An
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 230 (01) : 349 - 362