The development of the People with Aphasia and Other Layperson Involvement (PAOLI) framework for guiding patient and public involvement (PPI) in aphasia research

被引:3
|
作者
Charalambous M. [1 ,2 ]
Kountouri A. [3 ]
Schwyter J.R. [4 ]
Annoni J.-M. [1 ]
Kambanaros M. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Cognitive and Neurological Sciences, Department of Neurology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 8, Fribourg
[2] The Brain and Neurorehabilitation Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Arch. Kyprianos Str, Limassol
[3] Stoke Ambassador, Cyprus Stroke Association, Limassol
[4] Formerly Professor of English Linguistics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne
[5] Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA
关键词
Co-design; Framework; Patient and public involvement; People with aphasia; Stroke;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00484-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in aphasia research requires researchers to include people with aphasia as research partners from the beginning of the study. Yet the quality of reporting on the level and type of involvement is poorly documented in the absence of a framework to guide PPI in aphasia research. This study aimed to extract the items and statements relevant for the development of the People with Aphasia and Other Layperson Involvement (PAOLI) framework for designing and implementing PPI in aphasia research, in collaboration with people with aphasia. Method: The method recommended by the EQUATOR network was followed. This involved: (1) evidence from a scoping review, (2) a thematic analysis of the in-depth interviews, of people with stroke and aphasia, on the topics to be included in the pilot draft, (3) a two round Delphi survey for item/statement selection and (4) an experts’ consensus meeting. The research team involved two PPI partners with chronic stroke-induced aphasia. The research process involved co-design and was informed by the Dialogue model. Results: Twenty-three panellists, from 13 countries, voted in round one with 87% (20/23) responding in round two. The final PAOLI framework includes the following 17 items (with 66 descriptive statements): establish collaborations, recruit patients, gain informed consent, organize induction meetings, train patient partners, create communication links, engage communication partners, conceptualize topics, establish research priorities, reach consensus, work with co-design methods, develop proposals, assist with dissemination of results, promote implementation of the outcomes, support patient partners and promote self-evaluation, monitor progress and assess impact of the patient involvement. These items were considered by the panellists as the most relevant for the involvement of people with aphasia as research partners. Conclusion: The PAOLI is the first international consensus framework for guiding patient involvement in aphasia research. Researchers are encouraged to adopt the framework to improve the quality of their research by promoting the meaningful involvement of people with aphasia within the research team from the start. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PAOLI (PEOPLE WITH APHASIA AND OTHER LAYPERSON INVOLVEMENT) GUIDELINE FOR REPORTING PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PPI) IN STROKE AND APHASIA RESEARCH
    Charalambous, M.
    Kountouri, A.
    Schwyter, J.
    Annoni, J. -M.
    Kambanaros, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (03) : 91 - 91
  • [2] The ethics of patient and public involvement across the research process: towards partnership with people with aphasia
    Hersh, Deborah
    Israel, Mark
    Shiggins, Ciara
    APHASIOLOGY, 2021,
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT OF A PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT (PPI) RESEARCH NETWORK FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE RHEUMATIC CONDITIONS
    Larkin, L.
    Moses, A.
    Raad, T.
    Tierney, A.
    Kennedy, N.
    Costello, W.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 80 : 115 - 115
  • [4] Patient and public involvement (PPI) in palliative care research
    Heckel, Maria
    Meesters, Sophie
    Schildmann, Eva
    Ostgathe, Christoph
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2020, 158 : 107 - 113
  • [5] Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons: the involvement of people living in prison in the research process - a systematic scoping review
    Treacy, Samantha
    Martin, Steven
    Samarutilake, Nelum
    Van Bortel, Tine
    HEALTH & JUSTICE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [6] Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons: the involvement of people living in prison in the research process – a systematic scoping review
    Samantha Treacy
    Steven Martin
    Nelum Samarutilake
    Tine Van Bortel
    Health & Justice, 9
  • [7] The "pPI Hawker": An innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
    Luna Puerta L.
    Smith H.E.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 6 (1)
  • [8] Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research
    Pollard, Katherine
    Donskoy, Anne-Laure
    Moule, Pamela
    Donald, Christine
    Lima, Michelle
    Rice, Cathy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 28 (02) : 141 - 155
  • [9] Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in abortion research: an exploratory survey
    Blaylock, Rebecca
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 49 (01) : 69 - 69
  • [10] Facilitating the Involvement of People with Aphasia in Stroke Research by Developing Communicatively Accessible Research Resources
    Pearl, Gill
    Cruice, Madeline
    TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 2017, 37 (01) : 67 - 84