The evolution of the use of Foresight methods: a scientometric analysis of global FTA research output

被引:0
|
作者
Ozcan Saritas
Serhat Burmaoglu
机构
[1] National Research University,Research Laboratory for Science and Technology Studies, Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge (ISSEK), Higher School of Economics
[2] University of Manchester,Manchester Institute of Innovation Research
[3] Katip Celebi University,Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences
来源
Scientometrics | 2015年 / 105卷
关键词
FTA; Foresight; Foresight methods; Scientometrics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An increasing number of quantitative and qualitative methods have been used for future-oriented technology analysis (FTA) to develop understanding of situations, enable creativity, engage experts, and provide interaction. FTA practitioners have used frequently one or a suitable mixture of these methods for their activities. Changing policy and strategy making contexts as well as enabling technologies increased the need and possibility for performing adaptive Foresight studies in order to improve decision making about the future and using making better use of limited resources. This study performs a scientometric analysis of the publications in the major FTA journals with the aim of understanding the dynamics of using Foresight methods across time. Among the other branches of FTA, including forecasting, futures, and technology assessment, a special emphasis is given on Foresight as a systematic and inclusive way of exploring long term futures, developing visions and formulating policies for action. The study aims at detecting the key Trends and Weak Signals regarding the use of existing methods and emerging ones with potential uses for Foresight activities. Further implications will be achieved with the generation of networks for quantitative and qualitative methods. This will demonstrate the most frequently combined Foresight methods by researchers and practitioners. Where possible the methods will also be cross-fertilised with the key thematic areas to illustrate the relationships between policy domains and industrial sectors covered by the scope of study with methodological choice. This output is considered to be taken as a methodological guide for any researchers, practitioners or policy makers, who might embark upon or involved in a Foresight activity. Further outputs of the study will include the identification of centres of excellence in the use of Foresight methods and collaboration networks between countries, institutions and policy domains. Overall, the paper demonstrates how scientometric tools can be used to understand the dynamics of evolution in a research field. Thus, it provides an overview of the use of methods in Foresight, and how it is distinguished from the other FTA activities; the evolutionary characteristics of methodological design and factors influencing the choice of methods; and finally a discussion on the future potentials for new cutting-edge approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 508
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The evolution of the use of Foresight methods: a scientometric analysis of global FTA research output
    Saritas, Ozcan
    Burmaoglu, Serhat
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (01) : 497 - 508
  • [2] Scientometric analysis of global research output in robotic gynecologic surgery
    Vidal Jr, Manuel S.
    Tantengco, Ourlad Alzeus G.
    Gamo, Nancy Marie S.
    Lee, Ka Yiu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2022, 47
  • [3] Global Cyber Security Research Output (1998–2019): A Scientometric Analysis
    Dhawan, S.M.
    Gupta, B.M.
    Elango, B.
    [J]. Science and Technology Libraries, 2021, 40 (02): : 172 - 189
  • [4] Global Nanotribology Research Output (1996-2010): A Scientometric Analysis
    Elango, Bakthavachalam
    Rajendran, Periyaswamy
    Bornmann, Lutz
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [5] Evolution of primary care databases in UK: a scientometric analysis of research output
    Vezyridis, Paraskevas
    Timmons, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [6] Information Literacy: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Research Output
    Bapte, Vishal D.
    [J]. DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 40 (01): : 374 - 381
  • [7] Global scientific output trend for Akkermansia muciniphila research: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis
    Dehghanbanadaki, Hojat
    Aazami, Hossein
    Keshavarz Azizi Raftar, Shahrbanoo
    Ashrafian, Fatemeh
    Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat
    Hashemi, Ehsan
    Hoseini Tavassol, Zahra
    Ahmadi Badi, Sara
    Siadat, Seyed Davar
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Global scientific output trend for Akkermansia muciniphila research: a bibliometric and scientometric analysis
    Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
    Hossein Aazami
    Shahrbanoo Keshavarz Azizi Raftar
    Fatemeh Ashrafian
    Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed
    Ehsan Hashemi
    Zahra Hoseini Tavassol
    Sara Ahmadi Badi
    Seyed Davar Siadat
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20
  • [9] A Scientometric Analysis of Global Health Research
    Wang, Minxi
    Liu, Ping
    Zhang, Rui
    Li, Zhi
    Li, Xin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [10] Validity of Scientometric Analysis of Medical Research Output
    Masic, Izet
    Begic, Edin
    Begic, Nedim
    [J]. INFORMATICS EMPOWERS HEALTHCARE TRANSFORMATION, 2017, 238 : 246 - 249