Expression of an Acid Urease with Urethanase Activity in E. coli and Analysis of Urease Gene

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaofeng Liu
Qian Zhang
Nandi Zhou
Yaping Tian
机构
[1] Jiangnan University,The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology
来源
Molecular Biotechnology | 2017年 / 59卷
关键词
Urease; Urethanase; Apourease; Enzymatic properties; Molecular docking; Co-expression; Inclusion body;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Urea in alcoholic beverage is a precursor of ethyl carbamate (EC), which is carcinogenic. Enzymatic elimination of urea has attracted much research interest. Acid urease with good tolerance toward ethanol and acid is ideal enzyme for such applications. In the present work, the structural genes of urease from Providencia rettgeri JN-B815, ureABC were efficiently expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) in an active form (apourease) exhibiting both urease and urethanase (hydrolyze EC) activities. The specific activities of the purified apourease were comparatively low, which were 2.1 U/mg for urease and 0.6 U/mg for urethanase, respectively. However, apourease exhibited good resistance toward ethanol and acidic conditions. The relative activities of urease and urethanase remained over 80% in the buffers within pH 4–7. And the recoveries of both urease and urethanase activities were more than 50% in 5–25% ethanol solution. Apourease was utilized to eliminate urea in wine, and the residual urea in model wine was less than 50% after treatment with apourease for 30 h. Then 3D structure of UreC was predicted, and it was docked with urea and EC, respectively. The docking result revealed that three hydrogen bonds were formed between urea and amino acid residues in the active site of urease, whereas only one hydrogen bond can be formed between EC and the active center. Moreover, EC exhibited greater steric hindrance than urea when combined with the active site. Due to the low specific activities of apourease, both structural genes and accessory genes of urease were co-expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). The holoenzyme was expressed as inclusion body. After renaturation and purification, the specific activities of urease and urethanase reached 10.7 and 3.8 U/mg, which were 5.62-fold and 6.33-fold of those of apourease, respectively. Therefore, accessory subunits of urease play an important role in enhancing urease and urethanase activities.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expression of an Acid Urease with Urethanase Activity in E-coli and Analysis of Urease Gene
    Liu, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhou, Nandi
    Tian, Yaping
    MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 59 (2-3) : 84 - 97
  • [2] Preparation of crosslinked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) of acid urease with urethanase activity and their application
    Zhang, Qian
    Zha, Xiaohong
    Zhou, Nandi
    Tian, Yaping
    JOURNAL OF BASIC MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 56 (04) : 422 - 431
  • [3] The effect of three urease inhibitors on H. pylori viability, urease activity and urease gene expression
    Shaalan, Hanaa
    Azrad, Maya
    Peretz, Avi
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [4] Urease activity and ascorbic acid
    Quastel, JH
    NATURE, 1943, 152 : 215 - 215
  • [5] Urease activity and ascorbic acid
    Giri, KV
    Rao, PS
    NATURE, 1944, 153 : 253 - 254
  • [6] Urease inhibitors increased soil ureC gene abundance and intracellular urease activity when extracellular urease activity was inhibited
    Jiang, Dongqi
    Jiang, Nan
    Jiang, Hui
    Chen, Lijun
    GEODERMA, 2023, 430
  • [7] E-coli expressing Helicobacter pylori urease is susceptible to acid.
    Krishnamurthy, P
    Parlow, M
    Vakil, NB
    Mobley, HLT
    Levy, M
    Phadnis, SH
    Dunn, BE
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A189 - A189
  • [8] Inhibition of urease activity by ascorbic acid
    Elson, LA
    NATURE, 1943, 152 : 49 - 49
  • [9] Analysis of ammonium transporter and urease gene expression in Aureoumbra lagunensis
    Agostoni, Marco
    Erdner, Deana L.
    HARMFUL ALGAE, 2011, 10 (05) : 549 - 556
  • [10] E. Coli gene expression in biofilms
    Wood, Thomas K.
    Industrial Bioprocessing, 2006, 28 (10):