Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy

被引:0
|
作者
Glenn M. Preminger
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,The Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, The Division of Urology, Department of Surgery
来源
Urological Research | 2006年 / 34卷
关键词
Nephrolithiasis; Ureteroscopy; Calculi; Renal; Lower pole ureteroscopy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy devices and stone retrieval technology allow for the treatment of calculi located throughout the intra-renal collecting system. Difficulty accessing lower pole calculi, especially when the holmium laser fiber is utilized, is often encountered. Herein we review our experience where lower pole renal calculi were ureteroscopically managed by holmium laser fragmentation, either in situ, or by first displacing the stone into a less dependent position with the aid of a nitinol stone retrieval device. Lower pole stones less than 20 mm can be primarily treated by ureteroscopic means in patients: that are obese; have a bleeding diathesis; with stones resistant to shockwave lithotripsy (SWL); with complicated intra-renal anatomy; or as a salvage procedure after failed SWL. Lower pole calculi are fragmented with a 200 μm holmium laser fiber via a 7.5 F flexible ureteroscope. For those patients where the laser fiber reduced ureteroscopic deflection, precluding re-entry into the lower pole calyx, a 1.9 F nitinol basket is used to displace the lower pole calculus into a more favorable position, thus allowing for easier fragmentation. A nitinol device passed into the lower pole, through the ureteroscope, for stone displacement cause only a minimal loss of deflection and no significant impact on irrigation. Eighty-five percent of patients were stone free by IVP or CT scan performed at 3 months. Ureteroscopic management of lower pole calculi is a reasonable alternative to SWL or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in patients with low volume stone disease. If the stone cannot be fragmented in situ, nitinol basket or grasper retrieval, through a fully deflected ureteroscope, allows for repositioning of the stone into a less dependant position, thus facilitating stone fragmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 111
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy
    Preminger, GM
    [J]. UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (02): : 108 - 111
  • [2] Commentary on shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi
    Schenkman, Noah S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05): : S74 - S74
  • [3] Ureteroscopy Versus Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi in Children
    Tekgul, Serdar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : 1188 - 1189
  • [4] LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY FOR RENAL CALCULI
    MILNER, PC
    NICHOLL, JP
    THOMAS, KJ
    BIRCH, S
    WESTLAKE, L
    RICHARDSON, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6649): : 685 - 685
  • [5] Efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for lower pole renal calculi
    Sahai, A.
    Khan, F.
    Anjum, F.
    Dickinson, I. K.
    Marsh, H.
    Sriprasad, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2014, 7 (06) : 389 - 393
  • [6] Efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for lower pole renal calculi
    Sahai, A.
    Abbaraju, J.
    Anjum, F.
    Dickinson, I.
    Marsh, H.
    Sriprasad, S.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 : 33 - 33
  • [7] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency
    Mostafa AbdelRazek
    Ahmad Abolyosr
    Mohammed S. AbdelKader
    Ahmed M. Hassan
    Ahmed A. Hamed
    Gamal Alsagheer
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 4477 - 4482
  • [8] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency
    AbdelRazek, Mostafa
    Abolyosr, Ahmad
    AbdelKader, Mohammed S.
    Hassan, Ahmed M.
    Hamed, Ahmed A.
    Alsagheer, Gamal
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (12) : 4477 - 4482
  • [9] Comparative Efficacy on Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Medium-Sized Lower-Pole Renal Calculi
    Jin, Lianchao
    Yang, Bing
    Zhou, Zhe
    Li, Ningchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (11) : 914 - 919
  • [10] Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
    Yuri, Prahara
    Hariwibowo, Rinto
    Soeroharjo, Indrawarman
    Danarto, Raden
    Hendri, Ahmad Z.
    Brodjonegoro, Sakti R.
    Rasyid, Nur
    Birowo, Ponco
    Widyahening, Indah S.
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA INDONESIANA, 2018, 50 (01) : 18 - 25