Modifications in artificial urinary sphincter placement

被引:1
|
作者
Myers J.B. [1 ]
Flynn B.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Urology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO, 80045, Academic Office One Building
关键词
Penile Prosthesis; Corporal Body; Urethral Erosion; Bulbar Urethra; Salvage Technique;
D O I
10.1007/s11884-008-0027-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although the male sling procedure is becoming increasingly popular, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the gold standard due to its favorable outcome, long-term durability, and ability to treat mild, moderate, and severe urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency. However, AUS mechanical failure and the small but predictable occurrence of infection, erosion, and sub-cuff atrophy make it imperative that prosthetic urologists be familiar with salvage techniques. Secondary techniques to manage common complications are Mulcahy AUS salvage for infection, Webster's transcorporal AUS cuff placement to prevent urethral erosion, and tandem cuff placement for urethral atrophy. Recent design modifications have introduced antibiotic-impregnated urinary sphincters that may decrease infections in primary and secondary AUS implants. Innovations in AUS placement, such as Mulcahy immediate AUS salvage and Webster's transcorporal cuff placement, have allowed restoration of continence in men who previously had conditions considered untreatable. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in octogenarians
    Ziegelmann, Matthew J.
    Linder, Brian J.
    Rivera, Marcelino E.
    Viers, Boyd R.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (05) : 419 - 423
  • [2] Urethral Strictures and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    Brant, William O.
    Hotaling, James N.
    Lenherr, Sara M.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 44 (01) : 93 - +
  • [3] Artificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly men
    O'Connor, R. Corey
    Nanigian, Dana K.
    Patel, Lhavin N.
    Guralnick, Michael L.
    Ellision, Lars M.
    Stone, Anthony R.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) : 126 - 128
  • [4] Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly men
    Stone, A.
    Nanigian, D.
    Patel, B.
    Guralnick, M.
    O'Connor, R. C.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2006, 25 (06) : 547 - 548
  • [5] Placement of artificial urinary sphincter in children and simultaneous gastrocystoplasty
    Holmes, NM
    Kogan, BA
    Baskin, LS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (06): : 2366 - 2368
  • [6] OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRANSCORPORAL PLACEMENT OF AN ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER
    Zafirakis, H.
    Alba, F.
    Shapiro, A.
    Westney, O. L.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2009, 28 (07) : 685 - 685
  • [7] Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement
    Linder, Brian J.
    Piotrowski, Joshua T.
    Ziegelmann, Matthew J.
    Rivera, Marcelino E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (03): : 716 - 720
  • [8] PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER PLACEMENT AMONG THE ELDERLY
    Raup, Valary
    Lu, Pamela
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Vetterlein, Malte
    Meyer, Christian
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Eswara, Jairam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1118 - E1118
  • [9] Use of flexible cystoscopy at time of artificial urinary sphincter placement
    Monn, M. Francesca
    Orr, Brian M.
    Mellon, Matthew J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 9859 - 9862
  • [10] COMPARISON OF PERINEAL AND PENOSCROTAL APPROACHES FOR ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER PLACEMENT
    Miles-Thomas, Jennifer
    Hernandez, David J.
    Wright, E. James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 618 - 618