Comparison of Perioperative Standard and Immunomodulating Enteral Nutrition in Patients Received Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Serkan Fatih Yeğen
Mehmet Tolga Kafadar
Mehmet Ali Gök
机构
[1] Ali Osman Sönmez Oncology Hospital Clinic of General Surgery,
[2] Health Sciences University Mehmet Akif Inan Training and Research Hospital Clinic of General Surgery,undefined
[3] Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital Clinic of General Surgery,undefined
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2020年 / 82卷
关键词
Immunonutrition; Perioperative; Abdominal cancer surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of standard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition on the clinical outcomes of the patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients who underwent a major elective abdominal cancer surgery in our clinic were randomly assigned preoperatively to two groups according to enteral nutritional intervention; Standard (ST) or Immunomodulating (IM) group. The patients who were randomized to ST and IM groups received Resource® 2.0 fiber and OraI Impact® RTD 7 days prior to surgery and 30 days after surgery, respectively. The outcome variables were as follows; infections (surgical site infection, pneumonia, abdominal abscess or septicemia), non-infectious complications (wound dehiscence, anastomotic leak, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure), need for intensive care unit admission, need for re-operation, length of hospital stay, and hospital mortality. A total of 78 patients were randomized (n = 39 in each group). Forty-five (58%) of patients were male and mean age was 62.9 ± 13.4 (25–85). The mean pre-operative Body Mass Index (BMI) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) scores were 26.5 ± 5.4 and 2.3 ± 1.1, respectively. There were no significant differences in gender, age, BMI, and NRS-2002 scores between groups (p ≥ 0.05). ASA scores, surgical interventions also were similar in two groups. Rate of surgical site infection in groups ST and IM was 72% (n = 28) and 15% (n = 6), (p < 0.001). Rate of pneumonia in groups ST and IM was 25% (n = 10) and 0% (n = 0), (p < 0.001). Rate of urinary tract infection in groups ST and IM was 33.3% (n = 13) and 5.1% (n = 2), (p < 0.03). Length of hospital stay in groups ST and IM was 8.4 ± 4.8 and 6.1 ± 1.4, respectively (p < 0,003). There were no significant differences in other outcome variables between groups (p ≥ 0.05, for all comparisons). Perioperative immunomodulating enteral nutrition may reduce the incidence of surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and length of hospital stays in patients who received abdominal cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 834
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Perioperative Standard and Immunomodulating Enteral Nutrition in Patients Received Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
    Yegen, Serkan Fatih
    Kafadar, Mehmet Tolga
    Gok, Mehmet Ali
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 82 (05) : 828 - 834
  • [2] Standard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients after extended gastrointestinal surgery - A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Klek, Stanislaw
    Kulig, Jan
    Sierzega, Marek
    Szczepanek, Kinga
    Szybinski, Piotr
    Scislo, Lucyna
    Walewska, Elzbieta
    Kubisz, Aldona
    Szczepanik, Antoni M.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 27 (04) : 504 - 512
  • [3] Perioperative nutrition in malnourished surgical cancer patients - A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Klek, Stanislaw
    Sierzega, Marek
    Szybinski, Piotr
    Szczepanek, Kinga
    Scislo, Lucyna
    Walewska, Elzbieta
    Kulig, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2011, 30 (06) : 708 - 713
  • [4] The immunomodulating enteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients - A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Klek, Stanislaw
    Sierzega, Mara
    Szybinski, Piotr
    Szczepanek, Kinga
    Scislo, Lucyna
    Walewska, Elzbieta
    Kulig, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2011, 30 (03) : 282 - 288
  • [5] Perioperative Enteral Nutrition Improves Postoperative Recovery for Patients with Primary Liver Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Yan, Xiaopeng
    Liu, Lianxin
    Zhang, Yamin
    Song, Tianqiang
    Liang, Yingjian
    Liu, Zirong
    Bao, Xu
    Mao, Liang
    Qiu, Yudong
    [J]. NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (10): : 1924 - 1932
  • [6] Reduction of Postoperative Ileus by Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Major Rectal Surgery Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Boelens, Petra G.
    Heesakkers, Fanny F. B. M.
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    van Barneveld, Kevin W. Y.
    de Hingh, Ignace H. J. T.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    Roos, Arnout N.
    Rutten, Harm J. T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (04) : 649 - 655
  • [7] Standard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients after extended gastrointestinal surgery
    Zadeh, Reza Arsalani
    Macfie, John
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 28 (01) : 107 - 107
  • [8] Retraction Note to: Randomized clinical trial of arginine-supplemented enteral nutrition versus standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery
    Hongyan Zhao
    Hongying Zhao
    Yu Wang
    Huang Jing
    Qian Ding
    Jun Xue
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2015, 141 : 573 - 573
  • [9] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Randomized clinical trial of arginine-supplemented enteral nutrition versus standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery
    Hongyan Zhao
    Hongying Zhao
    Yu Wang
    Huang Jing
    Qian Ding
    Jun Xue
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2013, 139 : 1465 - 1470
  • [10] Early enteral supply of fiber and Lactobacilli versus conventional nutrition:: A controlled trial in patients with major abdominal surgery
    Rayes, N
    Hansen, S
    Seehofer, D
    Müller, AR
    Serke, S
    Bengmark, S
    Neuhaus, P
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (7-8) : 609 - 615