Trustworthiness and Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Bio-Economy

被引:0
|
作者
Lotte Asveld
Jurgen Ganzevles
Patricia Osseweijer
机构
[1] Delft University of Technology,Philosophy Department
[2] Radboud University Nijmegen,Faculty of Science, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society
[3] Delft University of Technology,Section Biotechnology and Society
关键词
Trustworthiness; Responsible research and innovation; Bio-economy; Institutions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The approach of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has been proposed to support the introduction of technologies that touch upon socially sensitive issues. RRI is intended to help designers and manufacturers of new technologies identify and accommodate public concerns when developing a new technology by engaging with a wide range of relevant actors in an interactive, transparent process. However what this approach amounts to exactly remains elusive as of yet, i.e. it is unclear what its contribution to the societal embedding of new technologies should consists of exactly. The transition to a sustainable bio-economy that uses biomass as its main resource is a complicated trajectory involving many actors and touching upon societally sensitive issues such as the use of genetic modification. In this paper we pose the question in what way RRI can stimulate the development and diffusion of a sustainable bio-economy in The Netherlands and Europe. We claim that for the further development and diffusion of the bio-economy, trust among actors in the relevant value-chain is a prerequisite. RRI can play a pivotal part in the bio-economy by providing conditions for trustworthiness of actors and by enhancing trusting relationships. This can be achieved through instruments such as personal relationships, third person guarantors, institutions and the communication of values. From the application of RRI to the context of the bio-economy, lessons can be drawn for other socially intricate technological trajectories.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 588
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trustworthiness and Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Bio-Economy
    Asveld, Lotte
    Ganzevles, Jurgen
    Osseweijer, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2015, 28 (03): : 571 - 588
  • [2] European research and innovation for the Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy
    Rute, Maive
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2011, 113 (1346): : 102 - 104
  • [3] Innovation Cascades and the Emergence of the Bio-Economy
    McKelvey, Maureen
    Niosi, Jorge
    [J]. PICMET '15 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, : 545 - 550
  • [4] BIO-ECONOMY
    不详
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2016, 117 (03) : 22 - 22
  • [5] BIO-ECONOMY
    不详
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2016, 117 (04) : 20 - 22
  • [6] Blueprint for the Bio-Economy
    Macdonald, Cindy
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2010, 111 (02) : 18 - 18
  • [7] The formate bio-economy
    Yishai, Oren
    Lindner, Steffen N.
    de la Cruz, Jorge Gonzalez
    Tenenboim, Hezi
    Bar-Even, Arren
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 35 : 1 - 9
  • [8] The global bio-economy
    Swinnen, Johan
    Riera, Olivia
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 : 1 - 5
  • [9] Academic entrepreneurship and scientific innovation in context of Bio-economy strategy
    Pipirigeanu, Mariana
    Zaman, Gheorghe
    Strasser, Horatiu
    Arama, Roxana
    Strasser, Constanta
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 'ECONOMIC SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH - THEORETICAL, EMPIRICAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES', ESPERA 2013, 2014, 8 : 556 - 562
  • [10] New Centre for Bio-Economy
    不详
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2010, 86 (03): : 303 - 303