Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress

被引:0
|
作者
Gurjinder S. Baath
Alexandre C. Rocateli
Vijaya Gopal Kakani
Hardeep Singh
Brian K. Northup
Prasanna H. Gowda
Jhansy R. Katta
机构
[1] Oklahoma State University,Department of Plant and Soil Sciences
[2] Grazinglands Research Laboratory,USDA
[3] USDA-ARS,ARS
[4] Southeast Area,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Novel drought-tolerant grain legumes like mothbean (Vigna acontifolia), tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius), and guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) may also serve as summer forages, and add resilience to agricultural systems in the Southern Great Plains (SGP). However, limited information on the comparative response of these species to different water regimes prevents identification of the most reliable option. This study was conducted to compare mothbean, tepary bean and guar for their vegetative growth and physiological responses to four different water regimes: 100% (control), and 75%, 50% and 25% of control, applied from 27 to 77 days after planting (DAP). Tepary bean showed the lowest stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic rate (A), but also maintained the highest instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) among species at 0.06 and 0.042 m3 m−3 soil moisture levels. Despite maintaining higher A, rates of vegetative growth by guar and mothbean were lower than tepary bean due to their limited leaf sink activity. At final harvest (77 DAP), biomass yield of tepary bean was 38–60% and 41–56% greater than guar and mothbean, respectively, across water deficits. Tepary bean was the most drought-tolerant legume under greenhouse conditions, and hence future research should focus on evaluating this species in extensive production settings.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress
    Baath, Gurjinder S.
    Rocateli, Alexandre C.
    Kakani, Vijaya Gopal
    Singh, Hardeep
    Northup, Brian K.
    Gowda, Prasanna H.
    Katta, Jhansy R.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Water Use by Five Warm-Season Legumes in the Southern Great Plains
    Rao, Srinivas C.
    Northup, Brian K.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 49 (06) : 2317 - 2323
  • [3] Physiological Responses to Soil Drying by Warm-Season Turfgrass Species
    Zhang, Jing
    Kenworthy, Kevin
    Unruh, J. Bryan
    Poudel, Bishow
    Erickson, John E.
    Rowland, Diane
    Kruse, Jason
    CROP SCIENCE, 2017, 57 : S111 - S118
  • [4] Overseeding Unimproved Warm-Season Pasture with Cool- and Warm-Season Legumes to Enhance Forage Productivity
    Bartholomew, P. W.
    Williams, R. D.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2010, 34 (02): : 125 - 140
  • [5] Growth responses of warm-season tallgrasses to dormant-season management
    Schacht, WH
    Smart, AJ
    Anderson, BE
    Moser, LE
    Rasby, R
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 51 (04): : 442 - 446
  • [6] Gas Exchange of Five Warm-Season Grain Legumes and their Susceptibility to Heat Stress
    Herzog, H.
    Chai-Arree, W.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2012, 198 (06) : 466 - 474
  • [7] GRAZING TOLERANCE OF WARM-SEASON LEGUMES IN PENINSULAR FLORIDA
    MUIR, JP
    PITMAN, WD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (02) : 297 - 302
  • [8] Estimating leaf area of warm-season perennial legumes
    Homem, B. G. C.
    Ferreira, I. M.
    Gionbelli, M. P.
    Bernardes, T. F.
    Casagrande, D. R.
    Lara, M. A. S.
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2017, 72 (03) : 481 - 488
  • [9] Establishment of three warm-season grasses under salinity stress
    Pessarakli, M.
    Kopec, D. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IIND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TURFGRASS SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT FOR SPORTS FIELDS, 2008, (783): : 29 - 37
  • [10] Differential Responses of Nutrients to Heat Stress in Warm-season and Cool-season Turfgrasses
    Shen, Hua
    Du, Hongmei
    Wang, Zhaolong
    Huang, Bingru
    HORTSCIENCE, 2009, 44 (07) : 2009 - 2014