Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability

被引:0
|
作者
Cathy M. Stinear
Winston D. Byblow
Maarten Steyvers
Oron Levin
Stephan P. Swinnen
机构
[1] University of Auckland,Human Motor Control Laboratory, Department Sport & Exercise Science
[2] Department of Kinesiology,Motor Control Laboratory
[3] Group Biomedical Sciences,Division of Physical Therapy
[4] Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,undefined
[5] Department of Health Sciences,undefined
来源
关键词
Motor cortex; Motor imagery; Visual imagery; Human;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hypothesis that motor imagery and actual movement involve overlapping neural structures in the central nervous system is supported by multiple lines of evidence. The aim of this study was to examine the modulation of corticomotor excitability during two types of strategies for motor imagery: Kinesthetic Motor Imagery (KMI) and Visual Motor Imagery (VMI) in a phasic thumb movement task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral motor cortex (M1) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the dominant abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM). In a separate experiment, transcutaneous electrical stimuli were delivered to the median nerve at the dominant wrist, to elicit F-waves from APB. Imagined task performance was paced with a 1 Hz auditory metronome, and stimuli were delivered either 50 ms before (ON phase), or 450 ms after (OFF phase), the metronome beeps. Recordings were also made during two control conditions: Rest, and a Visual Static Imagery (VSI) condition. Significant MEP amplitude facilitation occurred only in APB, and only during the ON phase of KMI. F-wave persistence and amplitude were unaffected by imagery. These results demonstrate that kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability, primarily at the supraspinal level. These findings have implications for the definition of motor imagery, and for its therapeutic applications.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 164
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability
    Stinear, CM
    Byblow, WD
    Steyvers, M
    Levin, O
    Swinnen, SP
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 168 (1-2) : 157 - 164
  • [2] KINESTHETIC MOTOR IMAGERY MODULATES BODY SWAY
    Rodrigues, E. C.
    Lemos, T.
    Gouvea, B.
    Volchan, E.
    Imbiriba, L. A.
    Vargas, C. D.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 169 (02) : 743 - 750
  • [3] Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Modulates Intermuscular Coherence
    Stepp, Cara E.
    Oyunerdene, Nominerdene
    Matsuoka, Yoky
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2011, 19 (06) : 638 - 643
  • [4] Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Acutely Increases Spinal Excitability
    Cowley, Patrick M.
    Clark, Brian C.
    Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S446 - S446
  • [5] Visual, auditory and kinesthetic imagery on motor learning
    Kim, J
    Singer, RN
    Tennant, LK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN MOVEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 34 (04): : 159 - 174
  • [6] The effects of kinesthetic illusory sensation induced by a visual stimulus on the corticomotor excitability of the leg muscles
    Aoyama, T.
    Kaneko, F.
    Hayami, T.
    Shibata, E.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 514 (01) : 106 - 109
  • [7] Characterization of kinesthetic motor imagery compared with visual motor imageries
    Yu Jin Yang
    Eun Jeong Jeon
    June Sic Kim
    Chun Kee Chung
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [8] Characterization of kinesthetic motor imagery compared with visual motor imageries
    Yang, Yu Jin
    Jeon, Eun Jeong
    Kim, June Sic
    Chung, Chun Kee
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [9] Imagery strategy affects spinal motor neuron excitability: using kinesthetic and somatosensory imagery
    Bunno, Yoshibumi
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2019, 30 (07) : 463 - 467
  • [10] Postural Control During Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery
    Grangeon, M.
    Guillot, A.
    Collet, C.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOFEEDBACK, 2011, 36 (01) : 47 - 56