Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction

被引:0
|
作者
Erica T. Y. Leung
Cheuk-Lun Lee
Xinyi Tian
Kevin K. W. Lam
Raymond H. W. Li
Ernest H. Y. Ng
William S. B. Yeung
Philip C. N. Chiu
机构
[1] The University of Hong Kong,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
[2] Queen Mary Hospital,Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[3] The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Urology | 2022年 / 19卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sperm selection in the female reproductive tract (FRT) is sophisticated. Only about 1,000 sperm out of millions in an ejaculate reach the fallopian tube and thus have a chance of fertilizing an oocyte. In assisted reproduction techniques, sperm are usually selected using their density or motility, characteristics that do not reflect their fertilization competence and, therefore, might result in failure to fertilize the oocyte. Although sperm processing in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) bypasses many of the selection processes in the FRT, selection by the cumulus mass and the zona pellucida remain intact. By contrast, the direct injection of a sperm into an oocyte in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) bypasses all natural selection barriers and, therefore, increases the risk of transferring paternal defects such as fragmented DNA and genomic abnormalities in sperm to the resulting child. Research into surrogate markers of fertilization potential and into simulating the natural sperm selection processes has progressed. However, methods of sperm isolation — such as hyaluronic acid-based selection and microfluidic isolation based on sperm tactic responses — use only one or two parameters and are not comparable with the multistep sperm selection processes naturally occurring within the FRT. Fertilization-competent sperm require a panel of molecules, including zona pellucida-binding proteins and ion channel proteins, that enable them to progress through the FRT to achieve fertilization. The optimal artificial sperm selection method will, therefore, probably need to use a multiparameter tool that incorporates the molecular signature of sperm with high fertilization potential, and their responses to external cues, within a microfluidic system that can replicate the physiological processes of the FRT in vitro.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 36
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction
    Leung, Erica T. Y.
    Lee, Cheuk-Lun
    Tian, Xinyi
    Lam, Kevin K. W.
    Li, Raymond H. W.
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    Yeung, William S. B.
    Chiu, Philip C. N.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2022, 19 (01) : 16 - 36
  • [2] Sperm selection for assisted reproduction
    Morrell, J.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2018, 53 : 80 - 81
  • [3] Microfluidics: The future of sperm selection in assisted reproduction
    Jahangiri, Ali Reza
    Ziarati, Niloofar
    Dadkhah, Ehsan
    Bucak, Mustafa Numan
    Rahimizadeh, Pegah
    Shahverdi, Abdolhossein
    Sadighi Gilani, Mohammad Ali
    Topraggaleh, Tohid Rezaei
    [J]. ANDROLOGY, 2024, 12 (06) : 1236 - 1252
  • [4] Advanced Sperm Selection Techniques for Assisted Reproduction
    Cariati, Federica
    Orsi, Maria Grazia
    Bagnulo, Francesca
    Del Mondo, Daniela
    Vigilante, Luigi
    De Rosa, Martina
    Sciorio, Romualdo
    Conforti, Alessandro
    Fleming, Steven
    Alviggi, Carlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [5] Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction
    Lepine, Sam
    McDowell, Simon
    Searle, Leigh M.
    Kroon, Ben
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Yazdani, Anusch
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (07):
  • [6] Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction
    McDowell, Simon
    Kroon, Ben
    Ford, Emily
    Hook, Ysanne
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Yazdani, Anusch
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (10):
  • [7] New horizons in human sperm selection for assisted reproduction
    Nixon, Brett
    Schjenken, John E.
    Burke, Nathan D.
    Skerrett-Byrne, David A.
    Hart, Hanah M.
    De Iuliis, Geoffry N.
    Martin, Jacinta H.
    Lord, Tessa
    Bromfield, Elizabeth G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction
    Zhang, Xiang
    Chao, Shuen
    Ye, Ningxin
    Ouyang, Dongfang
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [9] Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes?
    Sakkas, Denny
    Ramalingam, Mythili
    Garrido, Nicolas
    Barratt, Christopher L. R.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2015, 21 (06) : 711 - 726
  • [10] SPERM INFECTION AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
    CLAVERT, A
    CRANZ, C
    VIGNON, F
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION FERTILITE SEXUALITE, 1992, 20 (7-8): : 708 - 710