Does feeding behavior of a zoophytophagous mirid differ between host plant and insect prey items?

被引:0
|
作者
Wenjing Li
Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
Kongming Wu
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection
[2] International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT),undefined
来源
关键词
Omnivore; Diet selection; Electrical penetration graph;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many mirid bugs are omnivores, and several species are key pests of agricultural crops. While mirid feeding behavior on plant hosts is relatively well studied, little attention has been paid to foraging, acceptance, and consumption of insect prey items. In this study, we investigated the feeding behavior and stylet penetration of the green mirid bug Apolygus lucorum on insect prey (Helicoverpa armigera eggs), plant hosts (green bean Phaseolus vulgaris pod), and combined plant + prey diets. Direct observation and electrical penetration graph (EPG) assays were used to assess feeding on either food item. Overall feeding time was highest on combined diets (48.18 ± 4.92 % of total time) and plant foods (42.23 ± 3.36 %), compared with only 28.95 ± 2.27 % feeding time on H. armigera eggs. When exposed to combined diets, A. lucorum spent 3.8 times longer feeding on green bean pod than on H. armigera eggs. The overall duration of stylet penetration was 5866.27 ± 800.39 s on green bean pod versus 3644.81 ± 715.19 s on H. armigera eggs, representing a 37.87 % reduction in duration. Similarly, the duration of a single probing event was significantly higher on green bean pod (355.76 ± 50.13 s) versus H. armigera eggs (236.20 ± 25.17 s), with a 33.61 % reduction. This first work in which omnivory is studied by combined use of observational studies and EPG assays (1) provides further insights into A. lucorum omnivory, (2) further elucidates its trophic position in agroecosystems, and (3) guides the development of artificial diets for this pest species.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does feeding behavior of a zoophytophagous mirid differ between host plant and insect prey items?
    Li, Wenjing
    Wyckhuys, Kris A. G.
    Wu, Kongming
    [J]. ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS, 2016, 10 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [2] Functional relationships between plant feeding and prey feeding for a zoophytophagous bug
    Hamdi, Faten
    Chadoeuf, Joel
    Bonato, Olivier
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2013, 38 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [3] Can alternative host plant and prey affect phytophagy and biological control by the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis?
    Biondi, Antonio
    Zappala, Lucia
    Di Mauro, Angelo
    Garzia, Giovanna Tropea
    Russo, Agatino
    Desneux, Nicolas
    Siscaro, Gaetano
    [J]. BIOCONTROL, 2016, 61 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [4] Can alternative host plant and prey affect phytophagy and biological control by the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis?
    Antonio Biondi
    Lucia Zappalà
    Angelo Di Mauro
    Giovanna Tropea Garzia
    Agatino Russo
    Nicolas Desneux
    Gaetano Siscaro
    [J]. BioControl, 2016, 61 : 79 - 90
  • [5] Effect of host plant, prey species and intergenerational changes on the prey preferences of the predatory mirid Macrolophus caliginosus
    I. S. Hatherly
    B. P. Pedersen
    J. S. Bale
    [J]. BioControl, 2009, 54 : 35 - 45
  • [6] Effect of host plant, prey species and intergenerational changes on the prey preferences of the predatory mirid Macrolophus caliginosus
    Hatherly, I. S.
    Pedersen, B. P.
    Bale, J. S.
    [J]. BIOCONTROL, 2009, 54 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [7] Responses of insect herbivores to sharing a host plant with a hemiparasite: impacts on preference and performance differ with feeding guild
    Ewald, Naomi C.
    John, Elizabeth A.
    Hartley, Susan E.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2011, 36 (05) : 596 - 604
  • [8] Tomato plant responses to feeding behavior of three zoophytophagous predators (Hemiptera: Miridae)
    Perez-Hedo, Meritxell
    Bouagga, Sarra
    Jaques, Josep A.
    Flors, Victor
    Urbaneja, Alberto
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2015, 86 : 46 - 51
  • [9] Plant sterols and host plant suitability for a phloem-feeding insect
    Behmer, Spencer T.
    Grebenok, Robert J.
    Douglas, Angela E.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 484 - 491
  • [10] INSECT BEHAVIOR AND HOST PLANT-RESISTANCE
    BALIDDAWA, CW
    [J]. INSECT SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATION, 1985, 6 (03): : 337 - 340