Early warning scores predict outcome in acute pancreatitis

被引:0
|
作者
Giuseppe Garcea
Benjamin Jackson
Clare J. Pattenden
Christopher D. Sutton
Christopher P. Neal
Ashley R. Dennison
David P. Berry
机构
[1] The Leicester General Hospital,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
来源
关键词
Acute pancreatitis; early warning scores; prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Early Warning Score (EWS) is a widely used general scoring system to monitor patient progress with a varying score of 0-20 in critically unwell patients. This study evaluated the EWS system compared with other established scoring systems in patients with acute pancreatitis. EWS scores were compared with APACHE scores, Imrie scores, computed tomography grading scores, and Ranson criteria for 110 admissions with acute pancreatitis. A favorable outcome was considered to be survival without intensive therapy unit admission or surgery. Nonsurvivors, necrosectomy, and critical care admission were considered adverse outcomes. EWS was the best predictor of adverse outcome in the first 24 hours of admission (receiver operating curve, 0.768). The most accurate predictor of mortality overall was EWS on day 3 of admission (receiver operating curve, 0.920). EWS correlated with duration of intensive therapy unit stay and number of ventilated days (P<0.05) and selected those who went on to develop pancreas-specific complications such as pseudocyst or ascites. EWS of 3 or above is an indicator of adverse outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. EWS can accurately and reliably select both patients with severe acute pancreatitis and those at risk of local complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1015
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early warning scores predict outcome in acute pancreatitis
    Garcea, Giuseppe
    Jackson, Benjamin
    Pattenden, Clare J.
    Sutton, Christopher D.
    Neal, Christopher P.
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    Berry, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (07) : 1008 - 1015
  • [2] Predictors of Severity and Survival in Acute Pancreatitis Validation of the Efficacy of Early Warning Scores
    Garcea, Giuseppe
    Gouda, Mohammed
    Hebbes, Christopher
    Ong, Seok Ling
    Neal, Christopher P.
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    Berry, David Paul
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2008, 37 (03) : E54 - E61
  • [3] Early warning scores: Do they predict mortality in practice?
    Navinan, Mitrakrishnan Rayno
    Rodrigo, Chaturaka
    Fernando, Tharanga
    Rajapakse, Senaka
    Samarakoon, Lasitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACUTE MEDICINE, 2013, 3 (01) : 31 - 32
  • [4] Predicting outcome in acute respiratory admissions using patterns of National Early Warning Scores
    Forster, Sarah
    McKeever, Tricia M.
    Churpek, Matthew
    Gonem, Sherif
    Shaw, Dominick
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (05): : 409 - 415
  • [5] Early warning score independently predicts adverse outcome and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis
    Jones, Michael J.
    Neal, Christopher P.
    Ngu, Wee Sing
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    Garcea, Giuseppe
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (05) : 811 - 819
  • [6] Early warning score independently predicts adverse outcome and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis
    Michael J. Jones
    Christopher P. Neal
    Wee Sing Ngu
    Ashley R. Dennison
    Giuseppe Garcea
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 811 - 819
  • [7] Acute pancreatitis: radiologic scores in predicting severity and outcome
    Louke J. Delrue
    Jan J. De Waele
    Philippe O. Duyck
    [J]. Abdominal Imaging, 2010, 35 : 349 - 361
  • [8] A Better Way to Predict the Outcome in Acute Pancreatitis?
    Windsor, John A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 (07): : 1671 - 1673
  • [9] Acute pancreatitis: radiologic scores in predicting severity and outcome
    Delrue, Louke J.
    De Waele, Jan J.
    Duyck, Philippe O.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (03): : 349 - 361
  • [10] The Early Warning Score predicts outcomes of acute pancreatitis
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2006, 3 (10): : 537 - 537