Usage-based versus measure-based unit pricing: Is there a better index of value?

被引:12
|
作者
Kwortnik Jr. R.J. [1 ]
Creyer E.H. [2 ]
Ross Jr. W.T. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
[2] Sam M. Walton College of Business Administration, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
[3] Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
关键词
Economic Policy; Product Category; Potential Moderator; Unit Price; Good Index;
D O I
10.1007/s10603-005-6054-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In many product categories, unit prices facilitate price comparisons across brands and package sizes; this enables consumers to identify those products that provide the greatest value. However in other product categories, unit prices may be confusing. This is because there are two types of unit pricing, measure-based and usage-based. Measure-based unit prices are what the name implies; price is expressed in cents or dollars per unit of measure (e.g., ounce). Usage-based unit prices, on the other hand, are expressed in terms of cents or dollars per use (e.g., wash load or serving). The results of this study show that in two different product categories (i.e., laundry detergent and dry breakfast cereal), measure-based unit prices reduced consumers' ability to identify higher value products, but when a usage-based unit price was provided, their ability to identify product value was increased. When provided with both a measure-based and a usage-based unit price, respondents did not perform as well as when they were provided only a usage-based unit price, additional evidence that the measure-based unit price hindered consumers' comparisons. Finally, the presence of two potential moderators, education about the meaning of the two measures and having to rank order the options in the choice set in terms of value before choosing, did not eliminate these effects. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 66
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mobile Internet usage and usage-based pricing
    Prince, Jeffrey
    Greenstein, Shane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2021, 30 (04) : 760 - 783
  • [2] SOME FAQS ABOUT USAGE-BASED PRICING
    MACKIEMASON, JK
    VARIAN, HR
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1995, 28 (1-2): : 257 - 265
  • [3] Consequences of usage-based pricing in industrial markets
    Stoppel E.
    Roth S.
    [J]. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2015, 14 (3) : 140 - 154
  • [4] Usage-Based Pricing and Demand for Residential Broadband
    Nevo, Aviv
    Turner, John L.
    Williams, Jonathan W.
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2016, 84 (02) : 411 - 443
  • [5] Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Unit
    Schoonjans, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2022, 194 : 84 - 86
  • [6] Revenue Maximization for Communication Networks with Usage-Based Pricing
    Li, Shuqin
    Huang, Jianwei
    Li, Shuo-Yen Robert
    [J]. GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 4889 - 4894
  • [7] INTERNET USERS FACE POTENTIAL USAGE-BASED PRICING
    RIGGS, B
    [J]. COMPUTER, 1994, 27 (07) : 15 - 15
  • [8] Benefits and Costs of Adopting Usage-Based Pricing in a Subnetwork
    Alok Gupta
    Leigh L. Linden
    Dale O. Stahl
    Andrew B. Whinston
    [J]. Information Technology and Management, 2001, 2 (2) : 175 - 191
  • [9] Testing usage-based e-journal pricing
    Harwood, Paul
    Prior, Albert
    [J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2008, 21 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [10] Usage-based pricing of software services under competition
    Bala R.
    Carr S.
    [J]. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2010, 9 (3) : 204 - 216