Automated Design Error Debugging of Digital VLSI Circuits

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammed Moness
Lamya Gaber
Aziza I. Hussein
Hanafy M. Ali
机构
[1] Minia University,Computers and Systems Eng. Dept
[2] Effat University,Electrical and Computer Eng. Dept
来源
关键词
Fault diagnosis; Deep learning; Neural networks; Autoencoder;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the complexity and scope of VLSI designs continue to grow, fault detection processes in the pre-silicon stage have become crucial to guaranteeing reliability in IC design. Most fault detection algorithms can be solved by transforming them into a satisfiability (SAT) problem decipherable by SAT solvers. However, SAT solvers consume significant computational time, as a result of the search space explosion problem. This ever- increasing amount of data can be handled via machine learning techniques known as deep learning algorithms. In this paper, we propose a new approach utilizing deep learning for fault detection (FD) of combinational and sequential circuits in a type of stuck-at-faults. The goal of the proposed semi-supervised FD model is to avoid the search space explosion problem by taking advantage of unsupervised and supervised learning processes. First, the unsupervised learning process attempts to extract underlying concepts of data using Deep sparse autoencoder. Then, the supervised process tends to describe rules of classification that are applied to the reduced features for detecting different stuck-at faults within circuits. The FD model proposes good performance in terms of running time about 187 × compared to other FD algorithm based on SAT solvers. In addition, it is compared to common classical machine learning models such as Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) classifiers, in terms of validation accuracy. The results show a maximum validation accuracy of the feature extraction process at 99.93%, using Deep sparse autoencoder for combinational circuits. For sequential circuits, stacked sparse autoencoder presents 99.95% as average validation accuracy. The fault detection process delivers around 99.6% maximum validation accuracy for combinational circuits from ISCAS’85 and 99.8% for sequential circuits from ISCAS’89 benchmarks. Moreover, the proposed FD model has achieved a running time of about 1.7x, compared to DT classifier and around 1.6x, compared to RF classifier and GB machine learning classifiers, in terms of validation accuracy in detecting faults occurred in eight different digital circuits. Furthermore, the proposed model outperforms other FD models, based on Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), achieving 97.8% maximum validation accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 417
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated Design Error Debugging of Digital VLSI Circuits
    Moness, Mohammed
    Gaber, Lamya
    Hussein, Aziza, I
    Ali, Hanafy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC TESTING-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 38 (04): : 395 - 417
  • [2] Design error diagnosis and correction in VLSI digital circuits
    Veneris, AG
    Hajj, IN
    [J]. 40TH MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1005 - 1008
  • [3] Multiple design error diagnosis and correction in digital VLSI circuits
    Veneris, A
    Venkataraman, S
    Hajj, IN
    Fuchs, WK
    [J]. 17TH IEEE VLSI TEST SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 58 - 63
  • [4] Analog design issues in digital VLSI circuits and systems
    Becerra, JJ
    Friedman, EG
    [J]. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1997, 14 (1-2) : 5 - 8
  • [5] Design of Fault Injection Technique for VLSI Digital Circuits
    Lavanyashree, B. J.
    Jamuna, S.
    [J]. 2017 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (RTEICT), 2017, : 1601 - 1605
  • [6] Analog Design Issues in Digital VLSI Circuits and Systems
    Juan J. Becerra
    Eby G. Friedman
    [J]. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 1997, 14 : 5 - 8
  • [7] Correcting multiple design errors in digital VLSI circuits
    Veneris, AG
    Hajj, IN
    [J]. ISCAS '99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL 1: VLSI, 1999, : 31 - 34
  • [8] A THEORY FOR THE DESIGN OF SOFT-ERROR-TOLERANT VLSI CIRCUITS
    SAVARIA, Y
    HAYES, JF
    RUMIN, NC
    AGARWAL, VK
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1986, 4 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [9] Evaluating and improving transient error tolerance of CMOS digital VLSI circuits
    Zhao, Chong
    Dey, Sujit
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 814 - +
  • [10] Towards an automated design flow for memristor based VLSI circuits
    Xie, Lei
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Chao
    Yang, Jun
    [J]. INTEGRATION-THE VLSI JOURNAL, 2020, 70 : 21 - 31